Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hugo Award for Best Professional Magazine/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:49, 3 September 2010.

Hugo Award for Best Professional Magazine

 * Nominator(s):  Pres N  20:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Having finished Novels, Novellas, Novelettes, Short Stories, and Related Works, our Hugo Award journey continues on to one of the original categories, Best Professional Magazine. This is the first category brought to FLC that no longer exists, having been replaced in 1973 with an award specifically for editors. As always, comments from previous FLCs have been addressed here as well. -- Pres N  20:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 06:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Good work. Courcelles 21:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Meets criteria. I found no problems. Good work. --Dan Dassow (talk) 23:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support you got the blueprint by now. Sandman888 (talk) Latest PR 08:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.