Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jacques Rivette filmography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC).

Jacques Rivette filmography

 * Nominator(s): Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is accurate, complete and fully cited, but I would love to work with any editors on necessary improvements if needed. Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Support good work on my comments. Let's hope some more people show up to review the list! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 15:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Support, good work! &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Support – Nice job on this list. I read through and it appears the previous two reviewers addressed any major concerns this FLC may have had. Sucks it's been here so long though! TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 22:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Director note – Deoliveirafan, we need a source review at this point. It's already been listed on the top of FLC as needing one, so hopefully somebody will take it up. Vensatry has done some good source reviews for us; perhaps you can ask them for another look. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 23:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do by the weekend. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 07:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, been very busy lately. Thanks to all for helping out on this.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Source review
 * "He also worked as an extra ..." This bit isn't verified in either of the sources
 * I changed it to small role, but I think extra is better. All the sources I am finding say (translation) "a passerby", which is basically an extra but I guess that specific term doesn't translate. I think its a question of translation and extra should be reinstated.
 * What I'm saying is that, the 'extra' claim isn't verified by either of the sources used. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, I just used a new source.


 * Ref #9: Material faithful to the source
 * Again, it seems to be a question of translation and previous interpretations of translations, but I changed it to what the source says
 * I changed this to Assistant Director. --Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Did La Belle Noiseuse win Special Mention Prize of the Ecumenical Jury? Ref #34 doesn't say so. Our article doesn't mention the film either.
 * It is referenced in Ref # 35. Took me forever to find that as I recall
 * It still doesn't. The Cannes FF site doesn't mention it either. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It is currently reference # 34. The MUBI reference.
 * Unless I'm missing something, the film did not win the said award. The official source lists only the Grand Prix. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, ;User:Vensatry sorry for the delay and I do appreciate your help. Basically as I recall the Official Cannes page originally did have the award listed. At some point in the past few months them seem to have purged their website and now only include the most basic awards for each year. At that point (when I noticed it) I found the MUBI source. Is MUBI unreliable? I always thought it was.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, alright &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref #29: Years are inconsistent with the source. You need to clarify the same in the table.
 * I just eliminated most of this source. One date was wrong on the wiki page.
 * You haven't. It's now numbered at [28] &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean, currently the reference in question is # 41.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 19:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by 'eliminated' then? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I mean I took out that specific source for most titles in the filmography charts except for those not listed in the AllMovie source. Initially I intended to only use All Movie as the source for all of the titles, but found that some of the films were not included in that reliable source. So I found the French Ciné-Ressources (the source in question) and added it to ALL titles that it supported, both those already supported by All Movie and those not. Admittedly I overlooked the fact that some dates were wrong, which was sloppy of me. So by 'eliminate', I mean that now the Ciné-Ressources source is only used for titles not supported by All Movie.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Also to be clear, Reference number 28 is the All Movie reference. Reference number 40 is the Ciné-Ressources reference. The beginning of this conversation referred to Ciné-Ressources when it was still reference 29. Have you been referring to the All Movie reference?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC) I apologize, a few of the dates from All Movie are inconsistent. Fixing now.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * You link some publishers but not others
 * Fixed


 * In publishers, you use Festival del film Locarno, berlinale.de and Cannes Film Festival - Be consistent
 * Fixed


 * Is cinema1987.org a RS?
 * I hate this source. Lots of unreliable sources on the web, but this was the best I could find. It is very hard to google translate search in Japanese. I'll keep trying.
 * I added a better ref for the 1992 Kinema Junpo award. Hope that helps! ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 00:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Titles and publisher names should abide by WP:SHOUT
 * Fixed
 * Refs. #36 and #37 are still left. Also, add language in the former. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yea, I overlooked those. Fixed.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Rest all look good. The book sources used in the article are of high-quality. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 04:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing this. I'll keep looking for a better source for the Kinema Jumpo award.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

would you be prepared to indicate whether your concerns have now been addressed? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * sorry to nag, but can you respond here? Thanks.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * TRM, I have responded. A few points are still unaddressed. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Vensatry, appreciate it.  if you could let me know you're continuing to address Vensatry's issues, that'd be great.  The Rambling Man (talk) 21:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm done with the SR. This one is good to go! &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.