Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Johnny Winter discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC).

Johnny Winter discography

 * Nominator(s): Ojorojo (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Blues rocker Johnny Winter was a one-of-a-kind and his discography had a few twists and turns. This has been in the works for over a year and covers all of his recorded output, is carefully sourced and meets all the criteria. Hope you find it interesting & informative. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by Alexandra
 * The picture in the lead lacks alt text
 * never remaining at any one for more than two or three albums, so sometimes remaining for more than two - change to "for more than three albums"
 * Notes that are complete sentences should end with a period; ones that are sentence fragments are fine as is (see WP:CAPFRAG for details)
 * The King of Slide and The Woodstock Experience should sort as "King of Slide, The" and "Woodstock Experience, The"
 * Same goes for all the items under "Compilation albums" that begin with "The"
 * Otherwise, this looks good - please ping me when you have addressed the above and I will take another look!--AlexandraIDV 17:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, done. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I added archive links to the references and missing periods to a few more complete sentences, and I think everything's good to go now!--AlexandraIDV 18:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support--AlexandraIDV 18:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support Nice work. ~ HAL  333  19:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments
 * "45 rpm record single" record single reads odd to me. One or the other but not both.
 * Done. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Could tell us what that single was!
 * Reworded, not noteworthy for the second sentence. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * "recorded" used three times in three sentences makes for repetitive reading.
 * Reworded. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * " to Columbia Records.[1] With Columbia" repetitive.
 * Reworded. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * "the main American record charts" but you only mention (and list in the table) one, the Billboard 200.
 * Fixed. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * "remaining at any" remaining with any?
 * Done. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't follow the last sentence of the lead at all. What was the "discography situation" that having a three-year break made more complicated?
 * Removed, not important to his discography . —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Worth noting that his last studio album was a posthumous release?
 * Added a mention. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Not clear why italics is required as well as the asterisk, it makes the numbers crash into the symbol making it harder to read. Also makes the double asterisk even harder to delineate."
 * Since the other charts are not the one specified in the column header, I am thinking of moving them to efns, similar to the Canadian charts. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I moved these to efns, which eliminates the need for the footers also. Now they are all consistent. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Sortable tables means everything that's linked should be linked every time. My advice: make them unsortable.  I'm not sure what sorting adds here.
 * Removed, doesn't add much. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * "Billboard's" not sure that 's should be in italics.
 * Fixed. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Isn't the chart called "Top Blues Albums"?
 * At one time, but it's been just "Blues Albums" for more than nine years. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * "c.1961" normally a space after c.
 * Fixed. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I would order the infobox the same as the sections, i.e. Bootlegs before singles.
 * Done. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Why isn't, e.g. The Best of Johnny Winter notable enough to be linked as it hit 11 on the charts?
 * Albums may appear in a specialty chart, but only receive a brief mention in a review or bio and may not meet the significant coverage criterion (and not "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article"). Also, compilations are often discontinued/replaced after a few years, so may be unlikely to receive any further coverage. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * ""Rock and Roll, Hoochie Koo"" needs an en-dash in the chart place column before that footnote about Canada.
 * Done. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * "Albums as producer and/or guitarist" section, Billboard in table heading needs italics.
 * Fixed. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Concert videos not mentioned in the infobox.
 * Added. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Ref 41 needs spaced en-dash, not hyphen.
 * Added snd to Together (ref 40; 41 looks OK). —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

That's it from me. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 16:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm going to come back to the lead. Meanwhile, how about moving the other charts and the unlinked albums? —Ojorojo (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I trimmed some of the less important info from the lead, moved the footnotes from the bottom of the tables, and simplified the efns. That should do it. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Source review — Pass
Will do soon. Aza24 (talk) 09:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Bibliography
 * Formatting
 * Your locations are inconsistent, either include all or none of them, just needs to be consistent
 * Removed. The prior inconsistencies were due to only including locations as specified in the actual sources used (some have them, others don't). —Ojorojo (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

References
 * ref 24 has a different year then biblo, not sure which is right
 * Corrected typo. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * some of the page numbers, such as refs 24, 86, 95, 115 are missing periods
 * Fixed. Template:Sfn automatically adds a period, while Template:Harvnb doesn't. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Reliability
 * I see no issues here; AllMusic has a history of trusted critics, and non-authored links are just statistical information Aza24 (talk) 06:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Verifiability
 * Have glanced at some of this and found no issues. Aza24 (talk) 06:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed the issues. Thanks for a thorough source review. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Great! Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  03:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks to everyone for your suggestions and support. Also, thanks to for their contributions. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.