Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Kansas City Chiefs seasons/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by User:The Rambling Man 16:29, 29 June 2008.

Kansas City Chiefs seasons
Self-nom - This was greatly expanded thankfully to User:DCEdwards1966. I hope everything's ok with it to make it a featured list. '' conman33 (. . .talk)  03:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments


 * Please add new FLCs to the top of the list and not the bottom next time.
 * Remove links from "seasons completed by the Kansas City Chiefs American football franchise" per WP:LEAD; put the link somewhere else
 * Add a clear after the image so the table isn't skinny just because of that
 * Use en dashes per WP:DASH for scores like "31-7"

Gary King ( talk ) 04:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Opposes Lead needs expanding. Buc (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 10:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * Expand the lead a bit.
 * Don't use small text, there's no need and it makes it difficult for people with visualisation issues.
 * Don't overcapitalise in the table e.g. Post Season can be just Post season.
 * "Italicized numbers mean that the records are subject to change each week due to regular season or postseason games being played. " versus "seasons completed by". There should be no need for italicised text as all seasons here should be completed.
 * If the 2008 season isn't completed it shouldn't be here. You can add a link to the current season at the top of the article if you wish.
 * Note that WP:COLOR suggests you shouldn't use colour alone to indicate a particular property.
 * Add (AFL) after the first use of it.
 * Why have a league column if you include the league in the subheadings (e.g. Dallas Texans (AFL))?
 * Footnote 1 has a hyphen instead of an endash separating the W-L record.

Comments Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 22:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Can we get a more artistic introduction, rather than "This is a "
 * "87-48" ndash, per WP:DASH
 * There's not a single reference for the lead section.
 * Too much bold text. It should only appear in the opening sentence. WP:LS to avoid
 * Make the footnotes full-sized text by using  instead of reflist

POKE. Is the nominator doing anything regarding these comments? If not it should be closed as an abandoned nomination
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.