Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Katy Perry videography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 00:16, 25 August 2015.

Katy Perry videography

 * Nominator(s): Frankie  talk and Snuggums (talk / edits) 09:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

This list was previously the part of Katy Perry discography, but was separated by the user. Also, I would like to acknowledge and thank the fellow editor for the contributions he has made. I believe this a second open nomination for me, with the first one having already 5 supports and no outstanding concerns. I will try to resolve reviewer's queries with the best of my ability. Cheers. -- Frankie  talk 09:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added my name as a nominator given my edits to the article. Hope you don't mind. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course not in fact I was going to add your name anyway~, but it automatically inserted my name. -- Frankie  talk 14:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Azealia911

 * Consider a lighter shade of red for the infobox listing for "Television"
 * Could the N/A templates possibly be expanded? EG None . A bare N/A always feels so vague to me.
 * Can you explain the "Other videos" table to me? I see no reason why it can't be slotted into the above table.
 * Are any of the descriptions actually covered in the references? I've checked a couple, and in the two I've checked; Kesha isn't mentioned in the Hot n Cold reference, while Matt Dallas isn't mentioned in the Thinking of You reference.
 * Since this is for plot, I don't think we need to provide references for each and every plot point. And as the description does not provide any additional analysis, the contents should be easily verifiable. In that case, I am not sure if multiple references will help. Besides, no reference really states the "entire" plot of a narrative. Every plot point is only verifiable if we watch the entire music videos. Thanks for your other comments anyway. I shall resolve them tomorrow. -- Frankie  talk 21:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I worded it wrong, I wasn't asking you to verify every single detail in the column, EG, I'm not going to strong oppose due to the fact that the Part Of Me reference doesn't say who Perry's boyfriend cheated on her with, while the column describes her as a co-worker. Just things that may be challanged like the two examples I gave prior.  Azealia 911  talk  21:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I personally do feel sources should support plot details, and will spot check the references Snuggums (talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 22:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I have replaced those two sources, which now mention Kesha's and Dallas' appearances.


 * Add {{small|(featuring Patrick Stump) to the "Artist" column in "Guest appearances" for Cupid's Chokehold, like how Bitch I'm Madonna lists Minaj's feature.
 * "Company and product" is the header title for the "Commercials" table, yet there are no products mentioned in the column.
 * Of course there are e.g. Proactiv.


 * Nothing on this for commercials?
 * I am not sure about this one, but an ad was released by her to promote the film by Pepsi (which is mentioned in the list). Couldn't find a reference on this one.

That's all I spotted.  Azealia 911  talk  19:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ref #61 is dead.
 * Cheers Azealia, all fixed. -- Frankie  talk 22:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Support per my comments being addressed, quickly and politely too. Any comments at an FLC I currently have open are greatly appreciated!  Azealia 911  {{sub|talk}}  22:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments and support. I'll take a look at your nomination tomorrow. -- Frankie  {{sub| talk }} 22:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you very much {{u|Azealia911}} :) <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 23:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Wikipedian Penguin
Support&mdash;nothing else to quibble at, well done! The Wikipedian Penguin 09:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for such an exhaustive review. Much appreciated. -- Frankie  talk 09:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated indeed, <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 13:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from West Virginian
and, following my review of this list, I assess that you have adequately addressed many of the concerns previously raised above by and. The template at the top is beautifully formatted and the image of Perry in the info box is licensed CC BY-SA 2.0, so it is suitable for use here. The only unsourced content within the lede is content that is sourced below in the list, so that will do, which is in line with other featured videography lists. With that said, the article meets the criteria outlined in Featured list criteria and Manual of Style/Lead section. I only have two comments, which are merely suggestions and are not deal breakers by any means. Great job on this article! -- West Virginian   (talk)  18:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Thanks. I changed "music market" to "music industry", but Wikipedian Penguin above advised against using "music video" so much as it was repetitive. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 20:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Rather than say just "music market" which seem truncated, would it flow better if you render it as "the music industry market"?
 * Rather than sometimes using "video," every mention should be rendered "music video" for consistency's sake.
 * A thanks from me, too, West Virginian for such a polite review, which is quite rare in this encyclopedia. -- Frankie  talk 21:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support: and, thank you for addressing my two points, and for all your hard work on this list. Congratulations on a job well done! While I would prefer "music video" being used consistently, I will defer to 's review on that one. Thanks again! --  West Virginian   (talk)  22:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks for your kind review. Coming to your first query, I would agree with you on certain points. However, as WP Penguin said, it gets a bit repetitive as every time the readers know we are talking about music videos until the mention of film and television releases. Again, thanks for your review and support. -- Frankie  talk 00:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem,, and thanks for the support :) <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 02:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close.  Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the featured list candidates template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.  Giants2008  ( Talk ) 00:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.