Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Lady Gaga discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:05, 7 September 2010.

Lady Gaga discography

 * Nominator(s): – Chase  ( talk ) 00:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have structured it off several current FL-class discographies, including but not limited to: Madonna singles discography, Madonna albums discography, Taylor Swift discography, and Eminem discography. I believe that this is one of the finest pop discographies currently on Wikipedia and that this deserves to be a featured list. – Chase  ( talk ) 00:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment—no dab links, but all external links to Vevo don't work for me; they say that Vevo is not available in my country. Ucucha 06:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, Vevo is generally not available for people outside of USA. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 07:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I would use MTV.com but UMG and Vevo have pulled artists such as Gaga's videos from the site. – Chase  ( talk ) 16:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * What about VEVO on YouTube? I can use those in Canada.  Unless you aren't referring to videos.


 * Also, I remember helping work on some Lady Gaga articles during the entire debate about whether The Fame Monster was a new version of The Fame. Long time no see Legolas. =)


 * Oh yeah. Support.  CycloneGU (talk) 03:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Vevo on YouTube doesn't list directors, unfortunately. – Chase  ( talk ) 04:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Chase, I was thinking what about Interscope or LadyGaga.com? They list directors as well as the video it self. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Director info doesn't seem to be available for all the videos at Interscope.com and I'm not sure where videos can be found at LadyGaga.com. Links? – Chase  ( talk ) 18:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Support I think I am finished for good now. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: WP:DISCOG and WP:GAGA have been notified of this FLC in hope of attaining more comments. – Chase  ( talk ) 22:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. Very happy with the prose quality. All my concerns have been addressed and I can't see anything else of concern. Excellent work. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by Tb hotch Ta lk C.


 * Neutral to Weak oppose  If you want to make a B+ article is up to you. The lead still needing tweaks, I'm not an English speaker, but some issues are obvious. I really don't want to discuss about the citations, but if you want to follow to other lazy users (do not take it as a personal attack, because it is not) that do not want to fill all the parameters of the citation web is not my problem. They exist and is for a reason, I've never passed/supported an article through GA, FA or FL, if the basic usage  is not present, and of course, this won't be the only exception.  Tb hotch Ta lk C. 04:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC))
 * I don't spot any obvious issues. It's rather rude and annoying if you say there are problems but don't provide suggestions for improvement... sorry, but no matter how you wish to put it, "lazy" is a disrespectful comment that was not necessary. Most A good amount of of the websites used here publish themselves, and as I have already said several times, the publisher field is already occupied in many refs (as a replacement for the work field for non-print sources). – Chase  ( talk ) 17:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sigh... I'm probably just being difficult. Publishers have been added. Some had to be added as an addition to an already-occupied field so I'm not sure if those were done correctly. – Chase  ( talk ) 17:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Austrian, Canadian, German, Irish, New Zealand, Swiss and British is an example, Austrian, Irish and Swiss are gentilics, New Zealand no, also why is the British at the end while the others are in alphabetical order?
 * Changed, is "many countries worldwide" better? – Chase  ( talk ) 16:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * peaked at number two in the United States and topped -> would not be better list the "best" position first, just because she is American we not need to be remembered in each line.
 * Done. – Chase  ( talk ) 16:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It does not follow our policy of Neutral point of view, we know that she is having her fame but lines like were international number one hits. They were followed by the successful singles, yes were well-received, but you cannot praise them when they are not "Poker Face" or "Bad Romance" Tb hotch Ta lk C. 16:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * How exactly is this not neutral? "Just Dance", "Poker Face", and "Bad Romance" were number one hits in many countries, hence they were international number ones. I'm just stating facts here, there's nothing POV about it. And again, nowhere is it said that the last singles from The Fame were as successful as "Poker Face" or "Bad Romance". It is simply said that they were successful, which is, again, a fact. – Chase  ( talk ) 16:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Good work. Gage (talk) 01:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.