Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Airplay 100 number ones of the 2010s/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC).

List of Airplay 100 number ones of the 2010s

 * Nominator(s): Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it has improved a lot compared to its last FLC. A lot of work has been done on the lead and on the tables, solving a user's issues that remained unsolved last time. I believe the list is largely ready for FL status. Thank you in advance for comments! Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments from TompaDompa
Support TompaDompa (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments from A Thousand Doors
I really don't think that that Year column is an improvement. For one thing, it's entirely redundant – the Reached number one column already states the year. We tend not to have rowspans in sortable tables anyway, given how they break up unappealingly whenever the table is sorted, and then can only be remerged by refreshing the page. Adding an extra column bunches up the contents of other five (see how "Ain't Nobody (Loves Me Better)" and "Niciodată să nu spui niciodată" are now split over two lines, for example), and the visual separation between consecutive years is now considerably less clear (it's basically just one thin line in the Year column).

I know that this table is complying with the "good" example given in MOS:DTT, but that example was added by one user following very little discussion (in the fact, the discussion was between just two editors, one of whom was me). I'll bring up the issue on the talk page there, but, if there are no replies after a week or so (and there probably won't be, nobody's edited that page in over three years), then I'm just going to be bold and remove the "good" example, and suggest that we try to come up with an alternative solution for this article here. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 14:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi! I now removed the year column alltogether, as I realized it is superfluous since we have the dates each item reached number one. It would be a good idea to clarify the Manual of Style entry, since it could be helpful for editors wanting to improve other lists. Best regards! Cartoon network freak (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Was a consensus reached in the subject matter? Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No, there's hasn't been any response. For this article, it may be best to omit the year-breaking rowspans from the table entirely until a solution has been reached that meets MOS:ACCESS. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 00:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments from Lirim.Z

 * Support  Lirim  |  Talk  12:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude
Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  21:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.