Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Arabian Peninsula tropical cyclones/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC).

List of Arabian Peninsula tropical cyclones

 * Nominator(s): ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is the most thorough compilation of storms affecting the Arabian Peninsula. The region has been affected more and more in the past decade, with the three strongest storms on record in the adjacent Arabian Sea (Gonu, Phet, and Chapala) causing significant effects to the region. Add in a Yemeni civil war, the massive amounts of oil in the region, and a typically desert region getting lots of rainfall from storms, and you get some interesting effects. I believe the article is now ready for the rigors of the FLC process. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Support - Nice work! TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 19:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Support with the disclaimer that I've done some minor copyediting. I believe the article is a great resource that easily meets the FL criteria. My only suggestion would be to include a time period for the following: In 2014, an archaeology team discovered evidence that a major flood affected Ras Al Hadd in eastern Oman, possibly the result of a tsunami or a severe storm. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose until maps are provided. You guys have tons of maps showing paths, and I am sure you can create one for this list too. Nergaal (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. I contacted about it. He said he would be able to, but it just might be a few days. 03:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Is this proceeding? It's been 10 days now. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, keeps slipping my mind. Just need to compile a few more tracks then I'll be able to produce the map. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 21:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * where are we with this? The Rambling Man (talk) 22:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * just waiting on a few more track files to be converted into a format I can use with the map generator. Thought it would be a simple copy/paste job but turns out all of the pre-2007 systems needed to be re-transcribed. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 22:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Any timescale? I know there's no deadline but this has been ongoing for a month now. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Just waiting on to send me the revised track files then we're good to go. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 22:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * having some technical issues with the tracks... Need to go through them one-by-one and see what's bugging out the program. Getting closer though. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ok, thanks for the update. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ,, status? The Rambling Man (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ,, status? The Rambling Man (talk) 11:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The program is having a lot of issues with these tracks for some reason. I'm getting busier and busier and not sure I'll have the time to sit down and redo all the tracks again within a reasonable amount of time. Any way this can be overlooked with the agreement that it will be eventually added into the article? ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 15:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Since the original opposer has apparently "retired", I guess that's ok. I'll take a last look shortly.  The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I hadn't realised that DarthBotto had supported contingent on the tracks being included as well. It looks like we're stuck here, although three supporters haven't mentioned the need for tracks, one opposes based on their absence, and one support is contingent on it.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * &larr; For whatever it's worth, I'm happy to reaffirm my support despite the requested map having not been added. In my experience working with regional tropical cyclone lists, the cumulative track maps are mostly for aesthetics with limited illustrative value. They can show you the prevailing storm track, but that's easy enough to explain via text. In most cases the map will be missing the storms that occurred prior to the start of the official tracking period, and for this region in particular, even the storms with documented tracks don't always have available intensity data, so many of the tracks will simply be gray instead of color-coded for strength. Add to this the fact that there's no way to identify individual storms in the mass of dots and lines, and then the map really doesn't have a lot to tell you. It's a nice thing to have to make the article look nice and professional, but I've never considered it strictly necessary, and I know it's not a universal feature of similar lists. Just my thoughts... –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Support - I combined some duplicate refs with reflinks. Looks good to me. We're looking for additional reviewers on Featured list candidates/List of international goals scored by Abby Wambach/archive1. Hmlarson (talk) 22:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support, pending the inclusion of the map with the storm tracks : This article is ideally written, its references are intact, it is substantive and comprehensive, and it provides definitions for readers who are not initiated to the finer details of meteorology. I typically have more criticism to offer, but this article seems to be so well together that Nergaal's input speaks for me. Have your technical difficulty with the new map ironed out and you can call this my support vote. In the meantime, I would appreciate your input at Featured list candidates/List of Alien characters/archive1. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 22:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've decided to bump my support vote from contingent to good faith, with the assurance that the storm track will be included at the earliest convenience., you can count this as a support vote. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 22:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.