Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Archbishops of Canterbury

List of Archbishops of Canterbury
Looks good to me. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:06, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, I'm not going to vote because there is no lead, will check back and vote (Maybe an image!). Phoenix2 16:34, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah - good point. Added a lead (cribbed from Archbishop of Canterbury) and made the refs into refs. I've also split the table into Roman Catholic and Church of England. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:11, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Well done, . Phoenix2 15:52, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - looks good to me. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 11:50, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Very well done, although it seems odd to think of Thomas Cranmer as a Roman Catholic Archbishop. Dsmdgold 01:54, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment – 1) I clicked at random on Adrian and I got a dab page. Are there any more people that are linked to dab pages? 2) The "Incumbent" column takes up too much width in 800x600. The other two columns should be given more width instead of this column. There are also some things I don't understand. i) What is FBA? I think it should be linked. ii) Why are some names eg. George Leonard Carey in mixed bold and normal font?   =Nichalp   «Talk»=  05:48, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * (1) At random? As far as I am aware, having quickly scanned the list, none the others links to a disambiguation page, although there are a few redlinks.  As far as I know, we don't have a page on that Adrian. (2) I have tweaked widths - better? (3) An FBA is a fellow of the British Academy. (4) The bold parts of the name are how the person is known (so Rowan Douglas Williams is known as Rowan Williams) - I guess that should be explained. -- ALoan (Talk) 21:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that should be explained, and Adrian correctly wikified. The width of the cols are ok now. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  09:28, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Done and done. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Support -- but why is the table of churches at the bottom all cramped? The data in it takes up only half of the box. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  19:29, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, but why small font for tenure and notes? -- Ian &equiv; talk 03:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I think it was a stylistic choice of the author of the list, as was the bolding of names (the author is not me, by the way!). I don't have strong feeling about the style either way. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Support This is very good work --Sophitus 04:27, August 17, 2005 (UTC)