Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Best-Selling Popular Record Albums number ones of 1946/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:09:07 8 December 2019 (UTC).

List of Billboard Best-Selling Popular Record Albums number ones of 1946

 * Nominator(s):  Lirim  |  Talk  15:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Third Billboard album nomination, after 1945 and 2001 have been promoted. Thanks.  Lirim  |  Talk  15:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Support - all looks good now -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for addressing my points. I still disagree with the eponymous wikilink, but it is not a major issue. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * For future reference, I would not edit other reviewers' comments (in this instance, collapsing them with a header). I do not have an issue with it, but I have seen instances in which some reviewers in FACs or FLCs dislike it so it is probably best to avoid it altogether. Just wanted to let you know. Aoba47 (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Only issue I have is repeated links of artists like that of Bing Crosby or Benny Goodman or King Cole, in the box. Link once, its enough. Otherwise its a really well wriiten piece. Dey subrata (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent job . Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * they are always linked in the table so you can always use them. If you sort the table differently, you might not be able to access that other page directly.-- Lirim  |  Talk  17:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes I know they are linked so that one can open directly, but thats excessive to link a single name several times in a table which is short one and the article is very short article too. For example, Bing Crosby is linked in first row and again linked in the 4th row which is in the same frame of reader, if anyone need to open the article its not at all hard to click his name from first row and its most obvious if anyone want to read the artist's article they will surely click the first time they notice the name, same with Benny Goldman and Glenn Miller which are linked just one after another. It does not make any sense. So its better to remove the link and linking once is enough. You did the same with "Album Column" too. Dey subrata (talk) 10:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It is standard practice in a sortable table to link a name every time it appears -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Source review – The reliability and formatting of the references both look fine, and the link-checker tool shows no issues. Everything passes muster on the sourcing front. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.