Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1996/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC).

List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1996

 * Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

After my successful nomination of List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1994 and 1995, I am now nominating this list for FLC as part of the 2021 WikiCup. As always, looking forward to addressing any comments. Erick (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Table accessibility review (MOS:DTAB): The table is missing a caption.
 * Please add `|+ table caption` to the top of the table, or if it would duplicate a nearby section header you can visually hide the caption as `|+ `
 * -- Pres N  14:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Erick (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Support passes my source review -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * "(BDS)": We're generally only defining acronyms if they're re-used.
 * ""Ámame una Vez Más" by Amanda Miguel was the longest number one song by a female act where it spent eight weeks at this position.": There are lots of options here, but I don't think "where it spent ..." has sufficient support; something else would probably be better. "the longest number one song, at eight weeks, by a female act" works.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked the sorting: some reviewers will have a problem with "Amor en ..." coming before "Amor", but I think it's fine. The sorting isn't right on the artists column; Amanda Miguel shouldn't be sorted under A. Otherwise, the table is fine. I sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). Ref 12 would benefit from a retrieval date; otherwise, all relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. (I hope you'll drop by my plant list nominations, such as Featured list candidates/List of plant genera named for people (D–J)/archive1, every now and then, but they tend to be long, so don't sweat it.) - Dank (push to talk) 16:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support! I took your suggestions and amended the list with it! Erick (talk) 17:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that ... TRM didn't like "the longest number one song", and he has a point, readers might think the song had a longer run time. I'm not sure what's best there. - Dank (push to talk) 18:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Support made a couple of changes which will need copyediting, but do check the refs that haven't archived, I tried to load [17] and no joy... The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 18:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  03:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.