Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1999/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC).

List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1999

 * Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Ah yeah! I remember the Latin pop explosion like it was yesterday. I've been looking forward to nominating 1999 Latin pop for a long time. Anyways, please leave any feedbacks and I'll gladly address them! Erick (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * "The first number one of the year was "Dejaría Todo" by Chayanne, which had been in the top spot since the issue dated December 12, 1998,[3] where it spent a total of seven weeks at this position and was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year" => "The first number one of the year was "Dejaría Todo" by Chayanne, which had been in the top spot since the issue dated December 12, 1998;[3] it spent a final total of seven weeks at this position and was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year"
 * "was followed by the release of his song, "Livin' la Vida Loca", and became an international success" => "was followed by the release of his song, "Livin' la Vida Loca", which became an international success"
 * "and was longest-running number one of the year" => "and was the longest-running number one of the year"
 * "where it spent six weeks on the latter chart" => "spending six weeks at number one on the latter chart"
 * "Iglesias also had the most chart-toppers in 1999 with two other songs" => "Iglesias also had the most chart-toppers in 1999, also reaching number one with two other songs"
 * "the latter a Spanish-language version of "Rhythm Divine" and final number one of the year" => "the latter a Spanish-language version of "Rhythm Divine" which was the final number one of the year"
 * Image caption: "He also had the most numbers of the year with three" => "He also had the most number ones of the year with three"
 * Image caption: "Chayanne had the first number one of the year with "Dejaría Todo" and was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year." => "Chayanne had the first number one of the year with "Dejaría Todo", which was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year."
 * "Millie Corretjer (credited as Millie)," - if that's true, shouldn't she be listed as that in the table?
 * Think that's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Quick comment – "Corretjer was only the female artist to have more than one chart-topper...". "only" and "the" should be reversed here. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by AJona1992

 * Wikilink crossover
 * In regards to Ricky Martin's song, please specify the type of success the song had
 * "Corretjer was only the female artist" - needs to be rewritten
 * That's all I have. – jona  ✉ 18:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I now support this nomination after issues have been addressed. – jona  ✉ 21:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

,, , pinging all of three since I believe I took care of everything. Erick (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * "|url-status=live" in the only "cite news" template was giving an error message (because you had already set the url-status); I removed it.
 * In the table, Luis Miguel should be sorting under "Miguel" (according to the defaultsort in his article). I don't personally have a position on this, but if the name is supposed to sort under "Luis", then change the defaultsort in his article (and let's see what happens), or start a discussion somewhere.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. You've already got a couple of prose supports for the lead, so I'll leave that alone. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Close enough for a Support. Well done. I hope you'll consider reviewing List of basal superasterid families or List of early-diverging flowering plant families or (whenever I can nominate it) List of nitrogen-fixing-clade families. - Dank (push to talk) 22:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  13:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.