Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Tropical Airplay number ones of 1997/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC).

List of Billboard Tropical Airplay number ones of 1997

 * Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 01:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

With the Latin pop #1's of 1997 done, here is the tropical #1's of the same year. This year was really good for tropical music, with this list having some of my favorite tunes! Erick (talk) 01:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude

 * "It was succeed by Grupo Manía's song "Linda Eh" where it remained on top of the charts for four weeks" => "It was succeeded by Grupo Manía's song "Linda Eh", which remained on top of the chart for four weeks"
 * "Starr had previously established herself freestyle artist" => "Starr had previously established herself as a freestyle artist"
 * "returned to music scene" => "returned to the music scene"
 * "She is the only female artist to have a number one on the Tropical Airplay chart in 1997" => "She was the only female artist to have a number one on the Tropical Airplay chart in 1997"
 * Grupo Mania photo caption seems to have too many quote marks after the song title
 * That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * As always, thank you for the comments! I have addressed them all. Erick (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
Minor: when using rowscopes (scope=row), if the cell spans multiple rows, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. -- Pres N  19:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late response, it's been fixed! Erick (talk) 13:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by Z1720

 * Lede
 * "Negrón spent a total of 12 weeks at number one" -> "Negrón spent 12 weeks at number one" I think this will tighten up the language.
 * ""Inolvidable" was named the best-performing track of the year" Who named it this?


 * Image check
 * "File:FrankieNegronAirgo.jpg" The source of the image is not linked. The banner to this image asks to check with the source to verify this, but I am unable to do so. I suggest swapping this image or removing it.


 * Source check
 * Ref 1: Billboard should be wikilinked

Those are my thoughts. Please ping when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 19:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Z1720 Done and done. Fun fact: That image I replaced Negrón is the one I personally took way back in 2011. Erick (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm getting a red link on the Negron image. Was the correct file name used? Z1720 (talk) 19:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Z1720 Works fine on my end. Perhaps it needed to cache for the day since I cropped the image yesterday? Erick (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The image works for me now, but it is quite long on my screen. Is there a way to crop the bottom of the image so that it is more square and focused on his face? Z1720 (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Z1720 So I've cropped it further as suggested, but the changes don't show up yet. In the meantime, I'm using 150px. How does it look now? Erick (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry that I haven't responded. The article looks good so I can support. Z1720 (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry that I haven't responded. The article looks good so I can support. Z1720 (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. I've done some minor copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 21:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.