Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1948/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC).

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1948

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Here is the latest in the seemingly never-ending series of number one country songs FLCs, 56 of which have already been promoted and another looks to be on its way. All I can really say about this one is that it was definitely Eddy Arnold's year....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Florida Georgia Line spent a 22nd week → Florida Georgia Line spent the 22nd week
 * I do not believe that that would be correct English, I believe it is correct as it stands..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Between them the five songs → Between them, the five songs
 * Add  at the top.
 * That's it from me. Great work!  CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  12:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Two done, see my response to the other -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Support —  CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  13:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass
- fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Reliabillity looks fine
 * Ref 8 has a double page number
 * refs 8 and 4 should be ISBN 13s like the others (use [https://www.isbn.org/ISBN_converter the converter)
 * formatting is great otherwise Aza24 (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Great, pass for source review Aza24 (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Support Looks good to me. ~  HAL  333  22:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * I added as a table caption.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting with some comments in the edit summaries; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the table seems fine.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 00:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.