Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1954/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC).

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1954

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

With 64 of these lists at FL and another having multiple supports and a completed source review, here's #66 for your consideration. I suspect that people may be getting bored of these lists by now, but don't worry, we're lurching close to the end of the country number one song lists project (at which point I can start nominating the country number one album lists mwah-ha-ha :-D). A notable first in this year was the first number one to feature the sound of the pedal steel guitar, an instrument which for many people has come to embody the sound of country music.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Table accessibility review (MOS:DTAB): The table is missing a caption.
 * Please add `|+ table caption` to the top of the table, or if it would duplicate a nearby section header you can visually hide the caption as `|+ `. We haven't been the best about enforcing this, which is why I'm bringing it up now on list #66 :(
 * -- Pres N  14:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support  CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  10:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support —  Lirim  |  Talk  08:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I found a full stop to add; that was it. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked sorting on all columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 19:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  23:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.