Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1955/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC).

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1955

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone, here's the 69th of these lists to be brought to FLC for your consideration. This time we jump back to the 1950s. Fun fact: in this year Faron Young reached number one for the first time; he was on the bill at the very first live concert I ever went to, albeit much much later in his career than 1955 (I was about 5 at the time - guess my parents couldn't get a babysitter :-)) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * I was a big fan of "Sixteen Tons" as a kid (oops, showing my age!)
 * A table caption is required.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked sorting on some columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 04:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Source review – Pass
Doing now. Aza24 (talk) 00:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Formatting
 * Nothing for me to complain about unfortunately :)


 * Reliability
 * Looks great


 * Verifiability
 * No issues here


 * In general, nothing to say, solid job per usual—and I really tried to find something but here we are :) Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 00:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Wretchskull That's all I have. Good job, Chris! Wretchskull (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The three songs would share the record for more than fifty years, until [...] The sentence is one main clause, so the comma should be removed.
 * The first sentence in the Chart history section feels a little unclear, but I cannot directly point at anything that seems wrong.
 * This does not indicate [...] It feels more right to have "It does" rather than "This does" based on earlier text, but that could just be personal preference.
 * - done :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Support: My concerns have been addressed. Wretchskull (talk) 08:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
 * Table is missing a caption (you had it on the last one, so likely just slipped your mind.) -- Pres N  03:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * - fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - just a quick note to say that I will now be off-WP till Tuesday evening. If there's any fresh comments in that time, I will pick them up on my return..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Support from Aoba47
Everything looks good to me. I made some minor edits (which was just inserting a comma and fixing some spacing issues), but I could not find anything that needed to be addressed further. I support this promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  22:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.