Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC).

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk), DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

With 2021 out of the way, it's time to nominate this list ready to (hopefully) add it to the Featured Topic. This time round, I have added as a co-nom, as he did the legwork of adding each week's number ones as they were announced. Hope that's OK, Dan! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Image review

 * Passes my image review, though if you could replace File:191125 Taylor Swift at the 2019 American Music Awards (cropped).png with her any other image, would be better. Licence wise, it is fine (CC licences are non-revocable), but the fact that Cosmopolitan UK changed their video description to make licencing a bit more restrictive looks a bit ... Regardless, we have a lot of images in Commons:Category:Taylor Swift in 2019. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Source review

 * Passes my source review as well! On first read, I got nothing that could be an issue with the sources. On second read, the only thing I could get was that you can change the link target of Vulture in Ref#6 from  to   (a redirect page) just so that if redirects to a particular section. Ref#12 to Ref#113 — all good, as always! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose and the table coding seem fine. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 03:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments from TRM
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I thought we'd gotten into the mindset of linking "chart" in these articles?
 * "began being published" this seems awkward, could "began publication" or ", published since ..." work?
 * "number one on the Country Airplay chart, having previously been number one for the chart dated December 19, 2020,[2] while "I Hope" by Gabby Barrett held the number one " -> "number one" used thrice in a single sentence...!
 * In fact "number one" appears 17 times in the lead, and yes I know it's about number ones, but you could use alternatives to mix it up a little?
 * "give former American Idol contestant" we sometimes get told which season they were from for context.
 * I don't seem to be able to access ref 1 without a subscription.
 * - all address, I think. And can I say how good it is to see you back :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Same here, welcome back. - Dank (push to talk) 01:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Support my primary concerns addressed. And thank you both for your kind words. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by FrB.TG
Pretty solid list; just one minor tweak suggestion above. Support either way. FrB.TG (talk) 18:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "but went back to the peak position" - returned to.
 * All sources are properly formatted and reliable.

Promoting.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.