Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2022/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC).

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2022

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Just had a FLC promoted so figured I may as well nominate this one now. I realise there's still eight charts of the year to go, but by the time this FLC closes it will probably be four or five, and you know I'm good for keeping it updated to the end of the year :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * - apologies, I posted this last night thinking that my other open FLC had multiple supports but I now see it only has one. Honest mistake :-(  Would you like me to withdraw this one? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Eh, it's fine. This isn't your first (or 50th) FLC, so having two "active" nominations isn't likely to be an issue. -- Pres N  13:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * - thanks! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments – —Bloom6132 (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * "… was replaced in the top spot in the issue …" – should it instead be at the top spot? (I'm not sure about the grammar, so feel free to ignore it if I'm wrong)
 * Read the prose in detail – everything else looks all good.
 * Images utilized are licensed and tagged, with appropriate alt text.
 * I'd use the template with the "newspaper=" parameter for ref 1 (from The New York Times), but that's just my personal preference.
 * - done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Support – all comments addressed. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria.  Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Aoba47

 * Is there a reason for only have an image of Elle King in the lead rather than including one of her and one for Miranda Lambert?
 * Citation 1 requires a subscription as it links to an article by The New York Times, and this should be marked in the citation.
 * This is not a requirement for the FLC, but I would encourage you to archive your links.
 * Why is Billboard not linked in Citation 4?

Everything else looks solid. I just have two minor comments on two citations and a question about the lead, but once everything has been addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. Best of luck with the FLC!
 * - all done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing everything. I support this FLC for promotion based on the prose. Aoba47 (talk) 17:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * I don't know about the Walker Hayes image license ... what's the evidence that Sutton ever gave permission to use the photo? The uploader is User:Mbaumatl. User talk:Mbaumatl isn't encouraging. (I also have a minor question about the Morgan Wallen image ... when the username sounds like "Morgan Wallen" and the user provides an image of a stage performance, do we generally want some kind of confirmation where it's coming from?)
 * Ref 8 needs a retrieved date. (All other relevant retrieval dates are present.)
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose checks out. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review).
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. (See above about images.)
 * 6. It is stable (in the sense of "no edit wars" ... it's got another month of charts to go, so I'll check back at the end of the year, but I'm not expecting any problems.)
 * I'll be back. - Dank (push to talk) 02:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * - fixed ref 8 and replaced the Walker Hayes image -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. - Dank (push to talk) 13:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  22:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.