Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Bleach chapters


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 23:40, 28 February 2009.

List of Bleach chapters

 * Nominator(s): Tintor2 (talk)

I am renominating this for featured list after it had all its issues fixed from the previous nomination. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 03:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments from 
 * Lead


 * In Japan, they are published in Shueisha's Weekly Shōnen Jump since 2001. -- They are should be 'they have been'.
 * He also encounters former Soul Reaper Sōsuke Aizen who created an army of powerful hollow called arrancar to destroy the Soul Reapers' organization, Soul Society. -- Comma before who
 * An anime adaptation, produced by Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo and airing on TV Tokyo, premiered on October 5, 2004. -- Reword to An airing of a anime adaptation, produced by Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo, premiered on TV Tokyo on October 5, 2004.
 * Viz Media released the first volume on June 1, 2004, as of December 2008 twenty-five volumes have been released. -- Comma should be a semi-colon not a comma.
 * List


 * From my standpoint the listings seem fine, but I would seek a copyedit of the summaries of the chapters. But first of all, where are these based from?-- TRU  CO   02:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Done the lead fixes. The summaries are based on the volumes. Is there any notable grammar issue?Tintor2 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I mean, where do they come from. Are they reworded statements from another website? I'm not sure, but its a lot of content and a copyedit would be nice, just in case. TRU  CO   21:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Nope, they were made based on the volumes. If not they would be breaking copyvio.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, then. Due to that, it is best to seek a good copyedit of them. For now I will  Weak Support this nomination (since it meets the rest of the WP:WIAFL criteria) until a thorough copyedit is done. -- TRU  CO   22:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support: Meets the featured list criteria. -- Goodraise (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Note I have done two complete copy-edits (summaries only), one here and another here, after the summaries were expanded. I will repeat that I did not look at the lead. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I did some light touching up of the lead, nothing major. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Sourcing
 * Generally good, but can you find reliable sources to replace current refs 1 & 3. The encyclopedia section of ANN is editable by anyone, and therefore is not reliable. (NB. I have found mistakes with it recently). Rambo's Revenge (talk)  10:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * For ref 1, another source I found was this. Any idea of what source could be used for ref 3?Tintor2 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Something like that TV Tokyo Archive --KrebMarkt 19:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 19:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sourcing is now fine, apologies I don't have time to give a full review. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  15:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.