Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chartjackers episodes/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 08:19, 29 February 2012.

List of Chartjackers episodes

 * Nominator(s): Vo BEDD 23:51, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. It might a little shorter than other episode lists, but that's because the runtime of the entire series doesn't come to even 90 minutes, so there's not much that can be said about it. This is my first foray into the world of featured lists, so I'm sorry if there are some massive errors that I'm overlooking. Thankyou all in advance. Vo BEDD 23:51, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments I think the four teens who did the show should be mentioned in the lead, especially as two of them have articles.
 * Moved their names to the second sentence.
 * The summaries for episodes 4, 5, 8, and 9 are in a different format (it appears double-spaced on the mobile version of Wikipedia).
 * The only way I could think to solve this problem was just to stick the notes at the end of the paragraph. This has fixed the issue, but I'm not sure if it's now as visually appealing.
 * "Pudsey Bear" just redirects to the Children in Need article.

-- Glimmer721  talk  01:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Removed wikilinks. Vo BEDD 13:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking the notes shouldn't be italicized, in parentheses, or even with "note" in front of it...for example, the last sentence of the Episode 4 summary could simply be "The episode also featured a cameo from indie band The Young Knives, who sent the group a video message wishing them luck for their project". Also wondering if there is perhaps an image that could be used--like maybe File:Alex Day ChartJackers gig for Children in Need.jpg. Glimmer721  talk  02:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * both I've removed the italics, parentheses and "Note:"s, and have put the photo of Day in the top-right hand corner. Vo BEDD 04:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Looks good to me. Glimmer721  talk  21:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Ha, I remember watching this show when it was on. Gosh, has it really been two years already? I've had a brief look over the list, and, although I'm not particularly familiar with episode listings on Wikipedia, this seems to meet WP:WIAFL by my reckoning. One thing I would say is that the citations from the summaries of Eps 4 and 9 should be moved to the ends of their paragraphs. I also think it's kind of odd to have an image of only Alex Day in the right-hand-corner of the article, since obviously he was just one of the four guys on the show. Are there any free images of all four of them available, say, on Flickr? That being said, the absence of such an image isn't something that I would oppose over. Nice job! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 03:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Have moved the citations to the ends of the paragraphs. It seems that there are a whole load of great Chartjackers-related photos on Flickr, but none of them seem to be free use, unfortunately. If a free image of all four bloggers becomes available, I'd definitely use it to replace the current one. Thankyou for the support. Vo BEDD 09:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Support as nominator. Is, uhh, this allowed? I could swear that I've seen it done elsewhere on Wikipedia (although, now that I think about it, maybe not at Featured List Candidates). If it is a little audacious then I will apologise, and remove the self-support - I just wanted to give it a shot. Chalk it up as being bold and ignoring all the rules, if you'd like. Cheers all! Vo BEDD 12:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * We don't really count the nominator's support as it's implied when you nom a list at FLC. I'd be scared if you didn't think it met FL standards. :-) Giants2008  ( Talk ) 19:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ahh, fair enough then, I guess it was worth a shot. Thankyou for the response! Vo BEDD 03:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Support meets the criteria NapHit (talk) 23:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Image review: The image used appears to be free and is properly tagged.  Good raise  23:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.