Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Denver RTD light rail stations/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:04, 8 November 2010.

List of Denver RTD light rail stations

 * Nominator(s): Patriarca12 (talk) 01:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the FLC criteria as it is based on the templates set forth in previous FLC on similar topics (List of Dallas Area Rapid Transit light rail stations, List of Sacramento Regional Transit light rail stations, List of UTA TRAX stations) Patriarca12 (talk) 01:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 01:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - looks as good as my rail lists, LOL. Though all the PDF refs need to have —  Chris! c / t 01:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the support!  added. Patriarca12 (talk) 01:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support can't find any issues with the article. Arsenikk (talk)  16:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Worked to address most of your comments that I can. A copy-edit from a 3rd party still needs to be made, and is "scheme" a map? Thanks for the comments. Patriarca12 (talk) 23:07, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. I copy-edited the first paragraph. Ruslik_ Zero 18:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * oppose, the table(s) in this article do not meet the requirements of WP:MOS. If you look at WP:Wikitable you'll see that tables are required to use  --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1  &#124;  talk2me  18:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've retracted my own comment. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  22:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've added column scope to two tables, and row headers+scope only to the main table. I don't think the "under construction" table would find much benefit from row headers as it has only two columns. I've also added summaries to each table for use by screen readers. I believe this candidate is compliant with WP:ACCESS as far as the tables are concerned. --RexxS (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments


 * Comment Have the prose issues been resolved, and have Bamse and Ruslik been asked to revisit the nomination? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Issues noted by Bamse have been addressed and am waiting for a second response. Issues from Ruslik have been addressed as best I can without a peer review as the rules state "A list should not be listed at Featured list candidates and Peer review at the same time." Patriarca12 (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I examined the prose and did a copyedit, looks good to me.  Jujutacular  talk 00:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jujutacular for the copyedit. It is much appreciated! Patriarca12 (talk) 19:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Most of my issues have indeed been addressed. There are still three outstanding items though (see above). I don't care too much about the 2nd and 3rd issue (a reply would be appreciated though) but the first, i.e., the sentence: "The transition plaza is the area where tickets are purchased and passenger services can be found between the platform and where intermodal access is available." still reads confusing to me, partially due to the doubled "and". Maybe it could be split in two sentences? bamse (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the comments. I went back and tweaked all three of prose concerns mentioned above, and I do believe they read much better. Let me know if anything else needs to be amended. Thanks! Patriarca12 (talk) 12:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, much better now. bamse (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support I see no current issues. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support After all comments have been addressed. bamse (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Everything looks to meet criteria. Afro  ( Talk ) 23:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.