Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Detroit Red Wings seasons/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Hahc21 10:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC).

List of Detroit Red Wings seasons

 * Nominator(s): Rejectwater (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

The Detroit Red Wings are one of the oldest and most accomplished teams in the National Hockey League; this list chronicles their achievements season by season. From the thrill of victory to the agony of defeat it is all right here for your reading pleasure. It recently went through a substantive peer review featuring comments from several users, all of which I believe have been addressed (however I made no response and took no action on the comment regarding alt texts as I did not feel any action was necessary). I look forward to reading your comments and acting on your recommendations. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Support Good list overall, well cited, and seems to meet the technical qualifications. One minor quibble that I would like addressed, even though I'm supporting it - no citations in the lead at all. I know most of the information is found and cited below, but there's nothing to cite the Original Six claim, for example. I guess I'm just used to seeing citations in the lead, even if they're repeated below. Everything else is up to par though. Anthony (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I have added a source for the Original Six. Everything else, I believe, is as you said, found and cited below.  Please let me know if you think anything else in the lead should be cited.  Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks good now. Anthony (talk) 00:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your input, kind words, and support. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 12:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Disturbingly, I can find nothing to really comment on for this. There are a few language tweaks that I could suggest, but I suspect that they are mostly BR/AM English variations, and what is there certainly reads well enough for me. Well done!  Harrias  talk 09:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. Thank you for your kind words and support.  Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 12:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Support my concerns addressed and nothing more to report other than a good list! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your input, kind words, and support. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 16:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.