Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ECW Television Champions


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:51, 13 December 2008.

List of ECW Television Champions
Co-nominating with IMatthew: This article follows the examples of the FLs, List of WCW World Tag Team Champions and List of WCW Hardcore Champions, and as a result has a comprehensive prose and list the content in a comprehensive manner. Any comments, however, will be addressed by Matt or myself.--SRX 23:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * No bolding of the article title in the lead?
 * WP:BOLDTITLE isn't necessary if it doesn't repeat the title verbatim Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly what Matthew said :)--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's good to know. Thanks. Nikki  ♥  311  22:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Nikki ♥  311  03:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure if there is a way to fix it, but the Google Books url is visible in the references. ETA: This might be because it is also lacking the book's title.
 * I added the title, its fixed now.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Why did Osbourne have to vacate the title and WWE not acknowledge his reign?
 * Its unknown per official records, so I added that it was unknown for both instances that you mentioned.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, my comments were resolved and after another look over the article, everything seems to be in order. Nikki  ♥  311  18:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "ECW was a subsidiary for the National Wrestling Alliance (NWA)," -- surely a subsidiary of?
 * I knew it read weird, I couldn't think of the right term. Fixed.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "ECW, however, withdrew as a subsidiary of the NWA in 1994, and as a result, ECW gained ownership of the copyrights to its championships." --> "ECW withdrew as a subsidiary in 1994 and gained ownership of the copyrights to its championships."
 * Fixed.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "The championship remained active until April 2001, after ECW filed for bankruptcy." I think "after" is the wrong word here, perhaps. Does it mean it "remained active until April 2001, even after ECW filed for bankrupcy", or "remained active until April 2001, when ECW filed for bankrupcy"?
 * Changed to when.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "mid–2003" hyphen, not dash
 * Fixed.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "The ECW Championship was the only former ECW title reactivated by WWE for the new brand.[4] The ECW Television Title history was, however, published by WWE on its website, although it excluded various reigns after edits by WWE.[5]" --> "The ECW Championship was the only former ECW title reactivated by WWE for the new brand,[4] although the ECW Television Title history was published by WWE on its website; however, it fails to include various reigns.[5]"
 * Fixed.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "Hoynou legitimately injured his ankle" who?
 * Woops, I meant Hotbody (the previous champion).--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "ECW forced Osbourne to vacate the title." why?
 * I added that it was for unknown reasons.--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Sources looks good, checked with the Checklinks tool. Canniba  loki  00:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Not quite, see my comments below. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I fixed them.--SRX 18:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources look good now. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Dammit, I can't find myself getting here fast enough to reply! ;) Cheers,  aye matthew  ✡ 19:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You gotta be quicker man. :P--SRX 20:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Nice article you guys got there. --  SRE.K.A nnoyomous .L. 24 [c] 02:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.