Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Formula One World Championship points scoring systems/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC).

List of Formula One World Championship points scoring systems

 * Nominator(s): MWright96 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

This list is about the various points systems used by the FIA Formula One World Championship over the course of the history of the series to determine who wins the World Drivers' Championship and the World Constructors' Championship each season. I expanded this list two months ago and believe it meets the FL criteria. All comments are welcome MWright96 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
 * Table is mostly good, but is missing rowscopes: the primary cell of each row needs "scope=row", e.g. " | – " should be " !scope=row| – ". Rowscopes, in combination with the colscopes you already have in the header row, let screen reader software easily parse tables accurately
 * Done MWright96 (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * In general, it's frowned upon to have multiple rows spanned together in a column to the right of one where they aren't spanned together; I can't find any guidance against it in DTAB so it might just be a visual thing. I think that what you have here is fine as it makes sense for the data to span together what you have done, so this is just a note calling it out for awareness. -- Pres N  13:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments Other than these points, it looks good. NapHit (talk) 14:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "Unlike certain other motor racing series..." feel like you should mention which series. As a follower of F1, I'm a bit stumped about which series you're referring to.
 * "there have been 345 out of 770 Drivers' Championship points scorers..." this is a bit of a convoluted way of saying a certain number of drivers have scored points in a race. Would reword it for greater clarity.
 * I'm not sure if this is necessary per the criteria, but it would be nice to have an image in the lead. Perhaps of a Ferrari as they are the record points scorers?
 * Have addressed each of the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 17:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent work. NapHit (talk) 20:52, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Grapple X

 * I could be an idiot (I am an idiot) but I'm thrown by the "Drivers Championship" and "Constructors Championship" columns in the table proper. It seems to tally how many places points were awarded for in a race ("all" presumably meaning "up to 10th place"?) but entries like "9 (5 from first 6, 4 from last 5)" don't seem readily understandable from the text in the lead, which does mention "The format was expanded to include the first six finishers of each event between 1960 and 2002 but with no point for fastest lap" but nothing about the "last 5" (or last 6 or last 7, etc)? I could just be missing something on a hump day morning here but perhaps a note to explain this, just in with the other lettered notes, wouldn't go amiss.
 * Added abbr templates in the table for clarity MWright96 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated.
 * Not important or anything, but sometimes historic football seasons are compared with the modern game in an adjusted format (it used to be 2 points for a win, now 3, so comparing a season in, say, the 50s to now is sometimes done by adding those extra points); if there were a reliable source which contextualised Hamilton's record points tally on a similar basis it would be an interesting addition—a nice concrete example of the changing point systems and their impact. This obviously isn't something we should be doing ourselves but if you ever come across reliable sports coverage discussing it, it might be worth circling back to.
 * The only source I found of this was unreliable MWright96 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries. Would be an interesting addition if it ever comes up reliably but it's not necessary.
 * Overall seems well-cited and broadly researched, a good in-depth look. If PresN is happy with the accessibility of rowspans then I am, and the prose looks good to me. I'd be happy to support if my first point is addressed, even if that just means pointing out what I've missed. Good work. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 11:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Have replied to each of your points above MWright96 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm happy with this; ready to support this nomination. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 15:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Source review Pass
Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Version reviewed 1
 * Formatting
 * Ref#11 Sky Sports can be linked here. Linking a publication/website multiple times in multiple citations is not considered over-linking. (Per MOS:REFLINK)
 * Similar with Ref#15, 16, 21, 22, 25, 29 and others
 * Be consistent with whether to include publishing location or not. We just have them in two sources (Switzerland and Endland)
 * Reliability
 * No issues
 * Verifiability
 * Did a few spot-checks. Looks good.
 * Believe I have dealt with your concerns satisfactorily MWright96 (talk) 16:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Pass for source review. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.