Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Soul Singles number ones of 1978/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC).

List of Hot Soul Singles number ones of 1978

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

We carry on through the 1970s with the latest offering in this series, as for the first time the P-Funk mothership landed at the top of the chart. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Pseud 14

 * After three weeks in the top spot the single was displaced by "Bootzilla" -- comma after top spot
 * "Theme Song from 'Which Way Is Up'" and "It's You That I Need" respectively -- comma after "It's You That I Need"
 * For the table header add
 * Perhaps the info about "Serpentine Fire" should be mentioned in the lead instead, as it doesn't really serve a purpose being stated as a "key" and never utilized in the table, or you could also add an image of Earth, Wind and Fire and use it as a caption?
 * That's all I have. Excellent work as usual. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * - thank you for your review and your kind words. All the above points have been actioned! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Great job. Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

, all done, lovely work MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * MyCatIsAChonk
 * No song went on Billboard's year-end soul chart, as seen in past years?
 * See the Earth Wind and Fire image caption (and related comment from Pseud above, which led to this edit.....) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Whitburn only needs to be linked in the first template under "Works cited"


 * Support MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 11:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 04:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

NØ

 * Image review - pass: The images are appropriately licensed in line with the ones on prior lists in this series.
 * Source review - pass: The sources used follow a consistent format and are reliable for the purposes they are used. There is no uncited claim in the article.
 * Support--NØ 09:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Support from BennyOnTheLoose
Great work, as usual. Happy to support. (It Looks like Sean O'Hagan (journalist) could be wiki-linked.) BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.