Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of House episodes/archive2

List of House episodes
1st nom

I am renominating this list for FLC as I feel that all of the previous objections have been addressed. Tarret 01:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose pending the following fixes:
 * The references section shows an uneven formatting of references. Some use cite templates, others don't.  Consider using cite templates (see WP:CITET) for every reference, and fill in as MUCH bibliographic information as exists for each source.  The other option is to manually code each reference to include full bibliograpic information.  Either way, the references need cleaning up.  Also, entries 2, 4, and 5 are inconsistently formatted.  Fix entry 5 to match 2 and 4.  See WP:CITE for more information.
 * External Links section has some weird language. I would recommend naming the site in the "link" portion, and adding additional notes in plain text after the entry, if needed to more fully describe it.  As it is now, it is hard to follow.
 * Normally, leads aren't referenced IF they don't intoduce new information. However, this one DOES include information not in the rest article, like "airs in 28 countries".  Such claims need references.
 * Other than all of that, it looks good. If the fixes are made, I will change my vote.--Jayron32| talk | contribs  03:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment—episode-specific info like the final diagnosis doesn't belong on the episode list, just at the episode article. Cliff smith 05:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, why is this nominated when it has an incomplete To-Do list? Looks like there's work yet to be done. Cliff smith 05:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I would recommend checking out other FLs, like List of The Sopranos episodes and List of The Unit episodes. Also, if there's going to be pictures then they should all be of uniform size. Cliff smith 05:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * About the pictures: it would be good if the screenshots were of the particular patient (most already are, so nice work). Cliff smith 03:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose - the diagnosis field should be cut, it's too excessive/large for a small cell within an LOE. It should be left to the episode pages. Matthew 21:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I disagree - the final diagnosis is an important part of any episode, and does a lot to identify the episode in question. It certainly counts as aproriate "additional information" required by WP:WIAFL. Tom pw (talk) 19:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, why is the TOC floating left? -Phoenix 02:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's like that with most other LOEs. Cliff smith 02:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I fail to see it in any others, besides, it's not necessary here. In any event, I oppose because of the short episode summaries. -Phoenix 16:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose Insufficient episode summaries and inappropriate fair use rationales. Fair use rationales need to explain why this image is in this article. Not affecting the copyright holder is only FUC#2, if not more detailed we have to assume they fail FUC#8. With the episode summaries so short and poorly detailed, you won't be able to satisfy FUC#8. Jay32183 03:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per excessive use of fair use images. Renata 22:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, there is nothing in the Featured List criteria about excessive fair use preventing a list from becoming featured.-- 十  八  08:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If Renata's interpretation of FUC#3 is correct, then there is something in WP:FL? that prevents a list from being featured. The images must have acceptable copyright status, and if FUC#3 is failed, then the images do not have acceptable copyright status. In this case the FL? are not debatable, but you can go back and forth on FUC#3. Jay32183 20:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)