Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC).

List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls

 * Nominator(s): RoboCric (talk) 06:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I believe this article deserves to be a featured list. Made the list in accordance with the FL criteria. So, I am glad to present it for review and looking forward to your feedback. RoboCric (talk) 06:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * " In a T20I, each team plays single innings," => " In a T20I, each team plays a single innings,"
 * "The first five-wicket haul in an ICC Men's T20 World Cup match as well as any T20I match was" => "The first five-wicket haul in an ICC Men's T20 World Cup match, as well as in any T20I match, was"
 * "who picked up 6 wickets for 8 runs recording the best bowling figures in the T20 World Cup till date" => "who picked up 6 wickets for 8 runs, recording the best bowling figures in the T20 World Cup to date" ("till date" is not an expression in English)
 * "He set the remarkable record" - calling it remarkable is not WP:NPOV
 * "Rangana Herath's fifer against New Zealand on 31 March 2014, is" - no reason for that comma to be there
 * "Mujeeb Ur Rahman of Afghanistan is the first player" => "Mujeeb Ur Rahman of Afghanistan was the first player"
 * "on T20 World Cup debut" => "on his T20 World Cup debut"
 * Image caption: "Mujeeb Ur Rahman is the first player to pick up a five-wicket haul on ICC Men's T20 World Cup debut" => "Mujeeb Ur Rahman was the first player to pick up a five-wicket haul on his ICC Men's T20 World Cup debut." (note the full stop at the end) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Fixed all the issues you raised. Waiting for your further review or opinion. RoboCric (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments from Harrias
That's it from me. Harrias (he/him) • talk 13:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Explain what this means, and consider linking to Bowling analysis.
 * This would seem better as
 * "fifer" isn't encyclopaedic language.
 * Similarly, in this context, "grabbed" isn't encyclopaedic language.
 * Provide the wikilink on the first, not second, use of "average" here.
 * Be consistent throughout the article whether to use numbers or words for the number of wickets.
 * In the table, large and well-known cities such as London, Perth, Chittagong, Kolkata etc shouldn't be linked, per the MOS.
 * The "Season overview" table needs row scopes.
 * Both images need appropriate and descriptive alt text.
 * Oppose – no response from the nominator in four weeks, and concerns remain unresolved. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 07:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Harrias Done, I have fixed all the issues. I am really really sorry that I was very late. Actually I was completely out of online for 60 days due to my training purposes. I admit that it was my fault. I should have given a pre-notice here about my unavailability/wiki-break. I would be careful about this from the next time. Now I hope that you would reconsider about your opinion regarding this list. RoboCric Let's chat  11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you still oppose this nomination? -- Pres N  17:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Source review – Pending
Will do soon.  Aza24  (talk)   14:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Formatting
 * Dating missing for SportsAustralia ref 1
 * Page number missing for ref 5
 * Date missing in ref 7
 * Author & date missing in ref 8
 * Date missing in ref 9
 * Date missing ref 10
 * Author & date missing in ref 11
 * Author & date missing ref 13
 * Date missing ref 15
 * Date missing in ref 20, Daily sun
 * Date (& editor?) missing in ref 23, India Today (scroll to bottom of the page)


 * Reliability
 * ref 17, Sportskeeda, is not a reliable source. Should be switched
 * Looks okay otherwise


 * Verifiability
 * Spotchecked a few. Found no issues –  Aza24  (talk)   15:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, again I am coming very late online. Sorry to say I won't be able to fix it for next 1 month. I will try if i get onlin. Pls wait for some time with patience. RoboCric Let's chat  04:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, but your nomination has been here for 4 months with one support and one oppose. I would recommend you consider asking it is archived if you don't have to time to pursue it at the moment. You can always renominate it.  Aza24  (talk)   17:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.