Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of India women ODI cricketers/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 00:41, 15 November 2009.

List of India women ODI cricketers

 * Nominator(s): - Spaceman  Spiff  05:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all six FL criteria. The list provides a detailed view of the womenwho have played One Day International cricket representing India. It is comprehensive as of today, with a likely addition rate of about five to eight players every two to three years, and changing statistics for another five to eight players. The intro provides a summary view (with links) of ODI cricket and the Indian team. Other parts of the lead summarize the team's performance and that of the key players. One table provides the detailed view of all players while the other details the captains' performances over the years. I will be happy to address comments/suggestions/questions etc promptly. - Spaceman  Spiff  05:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments from nominator -- Just addressing some issues that are very likely to come up: cheers. - Spaceman  Spiff  06:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorting by last names is not used because of the different formats of names in India. Most importantly, the last name of some of these players isn't even part of the most common name.
 * The ndashes behave a bit oddly in some sorts. It doesn't happen always and not with all columns either. This appears to be a problem with other featured lists too and I haven't been able to find a solution yet.
 * The extra title bars in the middle and at the bottom are just for clarity. They do not affect sorting etc.


 * Support  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 01:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Superb.  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 07:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments – Only a couple of quick ones from me since the prose in the lead looks reasonable to me (though I'm not a cricket expert and can't judge content as well as some others). First, there could be a sentence or two in the lead on the team's captains, since it has a seperate table; even a brief mention of the number of captains would be helpful. Second, I've seen reviewers say that proper names should not be included in alt text, meaning this needs further revision here.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 21:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Support nice work, and an inspiration to the cricketing community who are attempting to recover some ground here at FLC! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Alt text changed (didn't know the proper nouns rule), thanks to User:Juliancolton for tweaking it further. I've added mention of the captains, split it to two sections -- number of captains along with the number of matches, most successful captain with the other stats summary (had to split this way instead of placing the no of captains along no of players as the stats would then be out of place). Thanks for the feedback, let me know if there are any other comments/concerns. - Spaceman  Spiff  05:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Support – Meets FL standards.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 04:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Support: Looks good. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 07:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.