Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Indian Premier League centuries/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:11, 4 September 2012.

List of Indian Premier League centuries

 * Nominator(s): ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that this list meets the criteria and is loosely based on FL List of Test cricket triple centuries. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quick comments


 * Support NapHit (talk) 16:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments – Done :)  →TSU tp* 01:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Try not to start a sentence with a number, like in "14 players have have scored 90–99 runs in an innings".
 * Also fix the double word in that sentence.
 * What makes Itsonlycricket (references 3 and 5) a reliable source? Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Support &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  09:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * - There "strike rate" is mentioned but I found it pretty less use and if I wan't to know balls faced, I will have to calculate. If I were reading an article on centuries (regardless of format), balls faced will be an important thing for me and most of the readers would want to know that how many balls were faced. Thus, instead of including SR, I believe that balls should be kept or both.  TheSpecialUser TSU 12:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Doing ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC) Done  ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:58, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It looks much better now :)  TheSpecialUser TSU 13:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Support — Nice work. Zia Khan 20:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Support  Harrias  talk 21:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Image review No other copyright related problems found.  Good raise  18:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Sanath jayasuriya portrait.jpg – Here's somewhat of a problem. You can't cut a part out of a work licensed under CC-BY 2.0 and release it under a different license.
 * I am not an expert when it comes to copyright, but the only condition of CC Attribution 2.0 Generic licence is attribution, and the is no condition of share-alike. Please correct if I am wrong. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You are correct, but this is a special case. When using a work licensed under CC-BY 2.0, you don't become the copyright holder of the original work. While you can create works based upon the original work, so called "derivative works", you can only release such a work under some license if you are the derivative work's copyright holder, which you are only if your changes/additions to the original work, unlike mere cropping, meet the threshold of originality.  Good raise  14:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 16:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Support &#8212; jfd34  ( talk ) 11:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.