Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of LPGA Championship champions/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:14, 21 August 2011.

List of LPGA Championship champions

 * Nominator(s): SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because this list fulfills FL standards. SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * " different occasions, which are the following:" - just have : after occasions, you don't need "which are the following"
 * Corrected.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 01:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sortable table, link everything linkable every time.
 * I will correct it if you tell me that it does not violate overlinking and repeatlinking policies.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 01:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I went and did it anyways in an attempt of being bold, so if it is wrong so be it, which the article now has many redlinks with respect to the courses.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 20:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Good, well they weren't policies in any case, they were guidelines. Plus we've always relinked things because in a sortable table, there's no way of knowing which item appears first once it's been re-sorted.  And if red links upset you, you can always create some articles...! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank for the explaination, I found out guidelines are different than policies on Wikipedia. I will pass on the creation of these articles at the present moment because just not enough time to dig up information and sources on them.  So, basically are policies like laws in society and guidelines are norms and customs in reality, just curious, if you think that is appropriate rationales.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 23:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That's about right. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I just wanted to get some perspective on Wikipedia. I think more reviews are needed on this article.  God, help me!  This process is taking forever like on those others, which took almost 50 days.  I guess that I better be a Job, when it comes to FLC's.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 20:48, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Do I need to have notes, which are references for each years event, or can we delete them and use a general one for all the list to meet FL criteria and verification measures? Just curious?SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 23:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Do we need to have a See also section with these respective articles on golf list for them to be FL?SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 16:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.