Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC).

List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex

 * Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

This list is in the same format as other featured lists of Local Nature Reserves, such as Hertfordshire and Buckinghamshire, and I hope it will also be found to meet the criteria. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Support no major issues raised, I'm happy. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Many thanks The Rambling Man. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Support lavishly illustrated, well-cited, all problems identified above fixed LavaBaron (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Why are we converting kilometer to miles? The subject is not American nor is this encyclopedia.
 * Brits use miles. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Changed. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I am not sure if you need the initials under Keys to be bold.
 * They are in bold in other similar lists and I think it is better to be consistent.


 * The beginning of the description of the sites are quite repetitive. Most of them either begin with "This (site)" or "The (site)". I would rearrange.
 * I will work on this. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have amended to give more variety to the beginnings. Does it look OK now FrB.TG? Dudley Miles (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's certainly better now.


 * Why are the YES (under public access) in capital?
 * Changed. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I think you might need to wiki-link the publishers in references (or not). It is up to you.
 * I have never (or very rarely) wiki-linked publishers and I do not think it is usual. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

I think that is it. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC) PS if it is not too much to ask, could you perhaps consider posting at FLC for listings of Bradley Cooper's films?
 * Many thanks for your comments FrB.TG. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Support FrB.TG (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Source review passed- not linking publishers is unusual, but is not against any rules as long as you're consistent. Promoting. -- Pres N  17:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.