Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Los Angeles Dodgers first-round draft picks/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 01:29, 24 February 2010.

List of Los Angeles Dodgers first-round draft picks

 * Nominator(s): Staxringold talkcontribs 21:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

In the style of all the rest. The one question I've got is if you guys think the odd role that Dave Anderson played in the Kirk Gibson 1988 World Series home run is worth mentioning in the lead. Staxringold talkcontribs 21:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. Mm40 (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Why are positions linked in both the second and third paragraphs? This is particularly harmful as it makes the links to players less noticeable. Also, in Scioscia's alt text, shouldn't it be "in a red warmup"? On the Anderson thing, I don't think it's worth mentioning, particularly as there's plenty of other stuff to discuss. Mm40 (talk) 23:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixing now. Staxringold talkcontribs 00:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments –
 * "for assinging amateur baseball players from high schools, colleges, and other amateur baseball clubs to its frachises." Check the last word again.
 * "Welch was also on the Oakland Athletics 1988 team". Apostrophe needed at end of Athletics.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 16:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Staxringold talkcontribs 16:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Support The Rambling Man (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Closing note Even though this FLC garnered a support, I have archived this nomination as unsuccessful, as more than a month has passed since this FLC was submitted, and the length of FLC has put off reviewers. Unfortunately, I have had to fail several old, stale FLCs because of this. Feel free to re-submit this FLC in 3 or 4 days after ensuring that the previous issues have been resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.