Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1945/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC).

List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1945

 * Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Here's the next list of number-one U.S. country songs (known as folk songs at the time - the term country music wasn't in use at the time). With 54 such lists already promoted to FL, for the next one let's jump back to the era of Western swing and singing cowboys....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Support ~ HAL  333  21:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Added a table caption with sronly. Avoided one redirect in the table (x2).
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the table seems fine.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support - Dank (push to talk) 22:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support -  CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  12:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass
Nothing to say here as formatting follows other FL lists in a very similar fashion. All reliable sources and consistent formatting. Mostly a procedural thing at this point! Pass for source review - Aza24 (talk) 00:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.