Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Muni Metro stations


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:58, 3 February 2009.

List of Muni Metro stations
My first FL nomination or maybe in a featured process of any sort. This is a continuation of the trend of bringing San Francisco Bay Area rail station lists here for FL consideration. — kur  ykh   08:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support — Chris!  c t 19:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I helped write this list and am satisfy with it, but I still have some comments. — Chris!  c t 19:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 9 subway stations -> nine subway stations
 * Done. — kur  ykh   06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The opening year of Balboa Park Station needs a ref
 * Done. Should the refs be shortened somehow? — kur  ykh   01:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Consider adding more info about stations to the lead (eg. ridership in stations)
 * I have looked far and wide, and this information isn't even available. There is ridership per line, but not per station. I will keep looking though. — kur  ykh   06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It is more helpful to order the metro lines based on years open rather than alphabetically. And add a note to explain this similar to List of Bay Area Rapid Transit stations. (just ignore the first part if lines are already ordered based on years open)
 * The problem is that unlike many other systems, Muni Metro line names have remained constant for the past century or so. The other articles seemed to have it sorted by years because of their names changing after every extension. Many descriptions regarding Muni Metro, formal or not, are done alphabetically, and it would be strange to do otherwise. — kur  ykh   06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok— Chris!  c t 00:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support my concerns addressed, good work. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, Rambling man basically read the review in my mind :P. I have the same concerns raised by TRM, I can support once those are done because this is excellent, but those few problems.-- TRU    CO   22:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - meets WP:WIAFL.-- TRU    CO   22:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Dabomb87 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * On several refs, you spell out abbreviations, which is good, but you never actually use the abbreviations by themselves. I think that those parenthetical abbrevations should be removed.
 * Done. — kur  ykh   19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Refs 1, 8 and 15 need  added to them.
 * Done. — kur  ykh   19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes http://world.nycsubway.org/us/sf/muni-streetcar.html a reliable source?
 * Removed; other sources suffice. — kur  ykh   19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.