Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2021)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC).

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2021)

 * Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk), Ladidadida123 (talk) and Ïvana (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

This list contains the winners of Music Bank in 2021. This is my second FLC nomination. I had previously nominated the 2020 list which is now a featured list. I have expanded the article in the past few days and believe that the article now meets the FL criteria. I added and  as nominators since they have significantly contributed to this article. --  EN  - Jungwon  13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by RunningTiger123
Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Comments by Z1720


 * "The chart includes digital performance on domestic online music services" I think performance should be performances
 * Done.
 * "and viewers' choice (10%)," How is this determined? That should be added to the article
 * Done.
 * The two notes should be cited
 * @Z1720 is it a problem if I add citations for the first note into the reference column in the table since that note is used in multiple rows. --  EN  - Jungwon  17:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It's fine for me, but it might get challenged at a later date. Z1720 (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Please ping me when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 12:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Image check: licencing is fine. All the images are YouTube screenshots and are licenced under there CC fair use.
 * Don't use fixed px size, use |upright instead
 * Done.
 * Source check: pass. Formatting seems fine.
 * Spot check version checked: . I don't read Korean so I checked the English sources.
 * Ref 6: I could not verify most of the information at the end of the second paragraph of the lede. Is there a citation missing?
 * Done.
 * No concerns with Ref 9
 * Support. My concerns have been addressed. Z1720 (talk) 15:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Source review – I'm not too familiar with either Korean news sites or K-pop sites, but I didn't see anything alarming in terms of source reliability. One issue with reference formatting should be addressed: ref 7 (from NME) has some weirdness where the latter part of the citation is being italicized. It looks like you have an extra quotation mark at the end of the title; I'd suggest removing that and seeing if it helps. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Giants2008 fixed the citation. You can see WP:KO/RS for a list of reliable Korean sources. --  EN  - Jungwon  12:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * With that issue resolved and a spot-check having been done earlier, I'd say the source review has been passed. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  19:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.