Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of NFL champions (1920-1969)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by 18:11, 14 February 2013‎.

List of NFL champions (1920–69)

 * Nominator(s):  Toa   Nidhiki05  02:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

I have improved this article considerably and I think it meets all FA-criteria. The list includes all NFL champions and runner-ups prior to the league's merger with the American Football League in 1970. I think this will be an excellent compliment to the companion List of Super Bowl champions article, also an FA.  Toa   Nidhiki05  02:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

"Links should clearly be identifiable as a link to our readers."
 * Support, assuming red and blue meets WP:ACCESS. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * According to WP:ACCESS:


 * I can't see any link issues, but I can see how there could be issues with them. I've replaced it with a lighter color that shows the link more clearly.  Toa   Nidhiki05  02:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, I am offering this up only for your consideration: List of Stanley Cup champions uses parentheticals for such denotions. i.e.: (WC) That may be easier for a reader to note what conference/division the teams were members of than six obscure symbols. Feel free to disregard this suggestion if you dislike that format.
 * I would not mind switching to that, but the NFL only has one article for the divisions/conferences, not two, so there would not be a unique. I used the symbols mainly because that is what is used on the Super Bowl champions article, or something similar.  Toa   Nidhiki05  01:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That's fine. You could link the relevant article in the key, leaving the (ED), (AC), etc. notes unlinked in the table itself.  However, I do agree that this list should be relatively consistent with the Super Bowl article, therefore this may be something worth discussing internally to the NFL project, if you feel it valuable. Resolute 03:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see it as too big of a deal, but I will either check with the group to see if it is fine or boldly do it myself.  Toa   Nidhiki05  21:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yup, no problem. As I said, I offer that only as a suggestion.  Therefore...


 * Support. My concerns have been addressed. Resolute 00:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support nice work! Arsenikk (talk)  23:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.