Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of NME number-one singles from the 1960s/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:31, 22 October 2010.

List of NME number-one singles from the 1960s

 * Nominator(s): Rambo's Revenge (talk)  19:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Another chart, this one is not the most famous list of UK number-ones in the 1960s but it was the most widely followed of the decade. Confused, then read the list. Thanks in advance for all comments. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  19:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 19:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - all looks OK to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support The Rambling Man (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I see no problem with this list. Afro  ( Say Something Funny ) - Afkatk 10:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * oppose, the table(s) in this article do not meet the requirements of WP:MOS. If you look at WP:Wikitable you'll see that tables are required to use  Also there's uncessary redlinks. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1  &#124;  talk2me  18:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * MOS mentions no such think. Note that is in the Help space not the Wikipedia space as a guideline. This is something dreamed up as an WP:ACCESS idealism (reminds me of alt text) and is clearly not feasible for complicated syntax tables like this. This has repeated headings too which cannot to my knowledge be handeled properly. Also have your read WP:REDLINK? Rambo's Revenge (talk)  19:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually a little more thought and less haste to reject would be nice here. WP:Wikitable is the approved code for wikitables. WP:ACCESS is part of the manual of style so its not something 'we' dreamed up. Then changes I am asking to be made (of which I will facilitate help with examples) are necessary because they make things accessible. The whole point of accessbility is it improves an article's readibility by calibrating wikitables for Screen Reading and Assistive Browser software. Such changes are necessary so that users hard of sight, color blind users and users of no sight can still access/read/use articles. It is not an idealism rather it is consideration for those who are less able than you or I. This is hardly complicated syntax compared to discographies. But then if WP:DISCOGSTYLE can comply why can't lists like this? There is no massive ask here. For some more background on the situation see WP:ACCESS and this. I urge you to keep an open mind and actually consider what's being asked instead of judging a book by its cover. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  21:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Retracted comments for now... its fairer since I would like to see a mass change that I am making notes on the featured list talk page instead. Sorry for the disruption caused. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  22:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.