Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club grounds/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC).

List of Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club grounds

 * Nominator(s):, ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

started this article and created the table, I have added an extensive lead and generally tweaked it a bit, and now feel it meets the FL requirements. It follows the same format as four similar lists which have been recently promoted to FL and one which currently has two supports, and all feedback from those FLCs has been incorporated into this article too..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Support meets the criteria, great work. NapHit (talk) 19:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments
 * "Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club is one of the 18 member clubs of the English County Championship - This needs to be sourced
 * Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Added another source since the one which you'd added doesn't quite cover the '18' claim. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 10:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * "the current club was established in March or April 1841" - Do we have any other source which clears up the uncertainty?
 * Not that I can find, but on reflection I don't think the specific month is important so I have removed it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * "The Nottinghamshire team have played first class, List A, or Twenty20 matches at eight different grounds. - Is it worth clarifying that Trent Bridge is the only venue to host T20s till date?
 * Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Although the notes look like being obvious claims, I'd suggest you to source them for the sake of reference completeness.
 * Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Link Hachette UK, BBC, and BBC News accordingly.
 * Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

&mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 17:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support, meets the standards. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 10:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Note/Hint/etc. - I have my own FLC Candidate Mexican National Lightweight Championship and I figured giving is the best way of getting feedback.

Comments
 * Lead
 * "and has competed in first-class cricket from 1841" - Should this be "since 1941" since it looks like they still compete in first-class cricket?? same with List A and Twenty20??
 * No, 1841 is the correct date, Notts have competed in first class cricket from 1841 to the present day, not sure what the confusion is....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry "1941" was a typo on my part. When I read the "From 1841" I read it as past tense, that they no longer played first-class cricket, but that is not the case from the table. MPJ  -US 21:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Table
 * Confused by the sort order of "no other matches to date" what is the sort criteria?
 * Where they have only played one match at a given venue, "no other matches to date" sorts as the date of that match -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright that works for me. MPJ  -US 21:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * At first glance I thought that Trent Bridge was no longer used either since it has a date in "last", technically what you have is the "most recent", I don't know if it would be worth noting the difference for that Cricket ground?
 * Well, technically speaking that was the last game at the ground until the next one.... ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Remaining sorting etc. looks good.


 * Sources
 * CrickeArchive is cited repeatedly, is that a Reliable source?
 * Absolutely. It is edited by Philip Bailey, author of "The Who's Who of Cricketers", chief statistician and records compiler for "Wisden Cricketers' Almanack", and generally regarded as one of the pre-eminent cricket statisticians of his generation -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Excellent, I am good with that.
 * The other sources look good to me.

Nothing in the notes are referenced in the lead - I did not realize that the cricket grounds had hosted other teams etc. to ensure the lead covers all major aspects would it be worth putting in a sentence or two around this? Not a deal breaker, just from doing GA reviews the "all major aspects" criteria is something I've been paying attention to. This is a very good list, only minor comments that I am sure can be addressed or explained, MPJ  -US 01:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Notes
 * Added a sentence in -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

With the added sentence I think we've got it all covered for me. Support  MPJ  -US 21:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Source Check by PresN
 * Formatting looks good, though ref 30 is missing isbn (978-1-119-99656-9)
 * Consider archiving your online refs, so that they don't get messed up by linkrot
 * Checked refs 2, 6, 16, 30 - all good
 * Source check- passed -- Pres N  19:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Support Bharatiya  29  14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Support Well-sourced, accurate, table works, similar standard to the other FL on County cricket grounds. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Promoting! -- Pres N  19:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.