Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of One Piece episodes (season 5)/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 07:12, 11 April 2009.

List of One Piece episodes (season 5)

 * Nominator(s): Goodraise (talk)


 * Notified: NocturneNoir‎ and Rambo's Revenge
 * Not notified: Dabomb87 (on vacation)

Since the last nomination, it has been copyedited. References to the ANN encyclopedia, which was recently declared non-reliable, have been replaced. Everything else was checked and re-checked, just to make sure. -- Goodraise (talk) 01:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support. My concerns, found at my talkpage, have all been addressed. ɳ OCTURNE ɳ OIR  (t &bull; c) 01:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: NocturneNoir reconfirmed their support. -- Goodraise (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Support. All sources are reliable and the summaries are easy to understand. Nice work.Tintor2 (talk) 13:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support. As per Tintor2's comment. Extremepro (talk) 11:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I still think the summaries need some copy-editing, which I will do tomorrow. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I confirm my vote of support per the new FL criteria. See Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria.Tintor2 (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't have time to go through all the episode summaries, my only comments are:  Rambo's   Revenge   (How am I doing?)   14:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "The next three episodes are called "Shutsugeki! Zenii Kaizoku Dan" (出撃!ゼニィ海賊団?, lit. "Sortie! Zenii Pirates")", not true is it? I thought the episodes have individual names (as indicated in the table) and the 3-episode arc is called this.
 * Reworded. -- Goodraise (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Why do you use "webcitation.org" for so many references where the original page still works fine. It just seems a rather round about way of doing things.
 * Webcitation.org archives on demand. Once the original pages stop working, I won't be able to archive them anymore. -- Goodraise (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The sourcing issues I previously brought up have been resolved in discussions between us. I am happy this page is reliably sourced.  Rambo's   Revenge   (How am I doing?)   14:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved (taking into account new criteria). Dabomb87 (talk) 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.