Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1960–69)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC).

List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1960–69)

 * Nominator(s): §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it majorly seems to fit the criteria and with comments from other editors it can easily pass. The list is based on the current FL List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1954–59). Looking forward for constructive comments. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Support - the minor issues raised by me were resolved. A very well written list.  Ya  sh  !   13:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Yash! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Support as a list that serves the project quite well.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I hope this doesn't mean anything, but I noticed that this one-line support was preceded by a review request on the reviewer's talk page that ended with a winking face. With reports of talk page spamming at another FLC, can we please refrain from symbols like that, which may lead sketical outsiders to presume canvassing? It just doesn't look good, even though I don't believe that was the intention. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 02:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ohhh! Didn't think that it could be interpreted as canvassing. The wink was only for the play of words and the popular film's title The Usual Suspects. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments from Vivvt


 * - Vivvt ( Talk ) 09:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments from Nvvchar
 * This sentence "It is ranked fifth in the order of precedence of wearing of medals and decorations." could probably be qualified.
 * Sorry ! I didn't understand your comment. What do you mean by "could be qualified"?
 * I mean "of the civilian and military awards".  Nvvchar . 07:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Done . §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Red link names for which there no WP articles so that some one else can write these articles.
 * Red links were asked to be avoided at the 1954-59 FLC. I have noticed that is doing a good job of writing articles on many of them and then linking them here.


 * Consider putting all the imgs in a gallery, though they have been fitted before the tables to the right in the FLC list approved for 1950-59.
 * We have been following similar format on many other FLs, not just Padma, where images of all/majority of the individuals are not present.

Even without these changes the list is supported for approval. Nvvchar . 14:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments from Cartoon network freak


 * With my comments being resolved, I am now willing support to this FLC. Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks CNF for your comments. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. However, in the first paragraph, there is a sentence: The Padma Bhushan award recipients are announced every year on Republic Day and registered in The Gazette of India, a publication released weekly by the Department of Publication, Ministry of Urban Development, used for official government notices. I opine that this sentence can be comfortably split into two. I also suggest you to rephrase that a list of recipients are announced and registered in the gazette. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Have rephrased and trimmed the sentence. Thanks for the comment. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Support A very well done list. The reference number 5 for Note (a) regarding the order of precedence could be updated to the latest No. 106-Pres/2004 notification that supersedes No. 75-Pres/2001 linked to the Indian Army website. The latest one can be found here. Does not change anything, purely cosmetic. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 20:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Have replaced with the link you provided. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

All appears to be good (after I made two minor tweaks) - SchroCat (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Source review

– SchroCat (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.