Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1970–79)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC).

List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1970–79)

 * Nominator(s): §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it majorly seems to fit the criteria and with comments from other editors it can easily pass. The list is based on similar current Featured Lists List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1954–59) and List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1960–69). Looking forward for constructive comments. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Support - an excellent list Dharmadhyaksha LavaBaron (talk) 18:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Comprehensive and well-written indeed. I could spot these two minor issues.
 * Comments from Pavanjandhyala
 * "On 31 July, the newly formed government retracted all civilian awards including..." -- all the civilian.
 * "Novelist Khushwant Singh who accepted the award in 1974 in the field of literature and education returned it in 1984 as a notion of protest against the Operation Blue Star." -- comma required after Singh and education. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Done with both comments. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support - good job! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Quick comment
 * You may want to add more images from Common. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 12:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Added four more images from Commons. Couldn't find more. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Support – With the fixes made, and a further edit that I made to a new photo's caption, I'm confident that this meets the FL criteria. Nice work. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Source review:


 * Formatting: ref27- the work is Seed Magazine, not Seed Media Group (that's the publisher) (I've fixed it for you). Also note that when you add an archiveurl, if you add "|deadurl=no", the first link will be to the live page, not the archive.
 * Spotchecks: refs 1, 10, 20, 28 checked; all clean
 * Completeness: No obvious sources missed

Passing source review, and so closing this nomination as passed. -- Pres N  15:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.