Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1990–99)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC).

List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1990–99)

 * Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC) & Vivvt 

Vivvt has been working on this list for a while, I did further expansion and cleanup. Looking forward to constructive feedback. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Support – Looks good to me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks BeatlesLedTV for the comments and support. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment by Force Radical
 * Fix alt text in images
 * Done


 * Consistent ISBN's
 * Done


 * Satyameva Jayate should be in italics
 * Done


 * Explain in brackets what Sansad means
 * Actually Sanad means 'certificate' or 'diploma', which is already mentioned in that sentence.


 * Preferably use UK US NZ and J as hooks for the footnotes instead of A, B, C, D
 * It doesn't look necessary to me.

That's all I have .Support — Force Radical ( Talk • Contribs ) 09:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments and support, Force Radical. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Support Courcelles (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Source review
 * Ministry of Home Affairs (India) could be wiki-linked.
 * Same with Indian Navy and Supreme Court of India.
 * You mentioned Indo-Asian News Service in ref. 15, but do not mention other agencies like Press Trust of India for ref 1. You might want to be consistent with the same.
 * Also, why mention Mumbai here exclusively?
 * You might want to wiki-link all the publishers on all their occurrences. I have been told that it's standard practice.
 * Other that the minor comments, all the refs are functional.  Vedant  Talk  18:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * All fixed. Thanks for your comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I've checked the sources again as it has been 3 weeks. They are all proper and functional. The source review is complete now.  Vedant  Talk  14:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


 * and It's been more than a month and this nomination has three supports, source review done, no unresolved issue. I think it should be promoted now. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, has not confirmed that their source review is completed, and  has not confirmed that their review is concluded, which is why I didn't close it when I did a sweep this past week. -- Pres  N  02:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  04:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.