Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Presidents of the Philippines/archive1

List of Presidents of the Philippines
Self-nomination. I believe it is qualified to be as such. It is stable, useful, comprehensive, accurate, well-constructed (I hope so), uncontroversial, uses the standards set by the style manual, and the images are in the public domain. - Howard the Duck | talk, 05:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. One comment - your notes could use the &lt;ref> style. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. - Howard the Duck | talk, 04:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Good work. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) Seen this already? 20:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Pls follow up and see Aguinaldo article, it sez January 1, 1899 Aguinaldo was named president (list marks January 23, republic day). He was also dictator-president even before then I believe. Once clarified, support. Good work. :) --Noypi380 16:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Clarified on both articles. Howard the Duck | talk, 23:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, great! It's perfect! C'mon people just write support and sign already. This is a "sureball" for a featured list. :) --Noypi380 12:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support-Add two pogi points to Howard the Duck for his List of Presidents! Keep up the good work!Jondel 13:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support definitely, although I think we should replace the current list on the President of the Philippines page with this new list, if it hasn't been done. --Akira123323 15:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Looks great. Circa 1900 00:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - It meets the criteria. I just don't like the size of Ferdinand Marcos's row, but apparently, there isn't much we can do about it. Afonso Silva 17:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - actually, I'm thinking of adding Marcos a new picture, the one when he's old already, to compensate the size of his row. I can't find public domain images. --Howard the Duck | talk, 00:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * IMHO, I think only the official presidential portraits should be used, well that's what I think at the moment. :) --Noypi380 12:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I know think everyone must have only one portrait. No favoritism hehehe --Howard the Duck | talk, 13:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Two things though. First, why does "First Republic" pipe-link to the article on the Philippine-American war? And secondly, could you add a legend/key for the party colors, sort of like 2006 NFL Draft (towards the bottom under Round 7), so that the colors actually mean more than they currently do (though the placement should be above the table, not below it like the draft page has it). And a comment. Perhaps you should consider moving the images to Commons, because as far as I saw, some of them were, while others weren't. They are all PD; it should be a smooth transition. Pepsidrinka 08:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Partially done. legend key added. Good idea, thanks. :) --Noypi380 12:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Partially done. The legend key that is. Also made a separate row for colors, since Marcos had two parties. The First Republic links to the Philippine American War for much of the time of the First Republic was spent on the war. --Howard the Duck | talk, 13:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Just a suggestion; Presidents of the United States has each row colored, whereas, this list just has that bit at the beginning of the row. Perhaps using the style used in the Presidents of the United States would be better. The only hesistation would be if it makes it too dark. Pepsidrinka 04:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom is better, where only one row is colored. Also, Marcos is a problem, he has two parties. Also, political parties in the Philippines is a lot different from the parties in the West. --Howard the Duck | talk, 13:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)