Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Roman Emperors/archive2

List of Roman Emperors
I have incorporated amendments in order to address the objections raised against the previous failed nomination (see Featured list candidates/List of Roman Emperors/archive1).

--JohnArmagh 09:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comments:
 * Section headings should not be wikilinked (see WP:MOS). Use main instead.
 * An explantion of terms like "Pontifex Maximus" and "Pater Patriae" would be good
 * The Eastern Empire section would benefit from having the same level of information as the rest of the list.
 * Tom pw (talk) 10:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 1. Haven't worked out how to integrate that yet
 * 2. Briefly introduced the main titles with wikilinks
 * 3. I agree
 * --JohnArmagh 11:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * comments: no particular value is added by wikilinking every standalone year and year-month. Only year-monty-day should be linked for date reading preferences.  Hmains 21:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Witty lama 15:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * The term "optimus" could be better translated than "the best"
 * As per Tompw no.2
 * Too much dense CAPITALS in the columns with the latin names. Doesn't make it easy to read.
 * Though consistent and comprehensive, the formatting is uninteresting/dull. The page is not aesthetically pleasing.


 * Comments Lead full of short one-sentence paragraphs. Needs to be expanded and flow. Please supply ISBN (and possibly edition) for the book references. Colin°Talk 11:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * 'Oppose due to issues with lead mentioned above, and also complete lack of images. Tom pw (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Where is there a definition of the word 'list' such that it is mandatory for such to contain images? --JohnArmagh 16:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)