Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Samuel L. Jackson performances/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC).

List of Samuel L. Jackson performances

 * Nominator(s): ~  HAL  333  15:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm back at it with another filmography. This time it's Samuel L. Jackson, one of my favorite actors and the highest grossing live-action actor of all time. ~ HAL  333  15:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * "Ignored" spelt incorrectly in note 1
 * "Tarantino-directed Pulp Fiction.[4] For Pulp Fiction" => "Tarantino-directed Pulp Fiction.[4] For the latter film" (to avoid repetition of the title)
 * "collaborated with Tarantino again in Django Unchained" =>"collaborated with Tarantino again on Django Unchained"
 * "He is scheduled to receive a Academy Honorary Award" => "He is scheduled to receive an Academy Honorary Award"
 * There are two credits for him playing Agent Augustus Gibbons but one just for Augustus Gibbons - this might be correct (the character might not be an agent in one film) but I jus thought I'd check.....
 * Good catch. ~ HAL  333  22:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Any reason why only the TV table is not sortable?
 * A Soldier's Play sorts incorrectly
 * Think that's all I've got. Great work :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All done. Appreciate the comments. ~ HAL  333  22:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Forbes.com/sites is being flagged by the UPSD tool as iffy (it depends on the particular page), and Express is flagged as "generally unreliable".
 * "and he has reprised the role in later entries": "reprise" shows up a lot in this paragraph; I think this is probably the bit that I'd cut back on to avoid repetition. Maybe you can delete it, or replace it with "and other films" or something. Otherwise:
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. I see Chris has checked the sorting. I've sampled the links in the tables.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. Except as above, the article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any other problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable. I'm a little surprised that there's no navbox (but I see that's standard in filmography lists) and so few categories at the end, but you'd know better than I do what's expected.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Close enough for a support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 14:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All addressed. ~ HAL  333  14:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Comments by Kavyansh.Singh
 * Hi @ This is not a source review, but just few comments


 * Add "RogerEbert.com" as work in Ref#59.
 * I would suggest adding WP links to all the websites/media sites, etc in the citations. Currently, some are linked (like The New York Times in Ref#99), while others are not.
 * I ended up unlinking everything. ~ HAL  333  16:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That works. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Capitalize l in "The los Angeles Times" (Ref#154)
 * Replace "New York Times" with "The New York Times" in Ref#169
 * Capitalize W and P in "The washington post" (Ref#183)
 * There is a Reference named "Archived Copy". (Ref#188) Reformat it.
 * Comment on images Three of the four images were originally posted in Flickr, and are licenced properly. The remaining image was original work of a user, which was confirmed by an OTRS ticket. I see no issues.  Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All addressed. ~ HAL  333  16:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing everything. I see no other major issue with the table, and I feel I can support this list for promotion as a Featured list. It would be a great help if you could review any of my current 2 FLC's. Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Comments for Birdienest81
 * Nothing really much. However, I would move non-periodical sources such as Rotten Tomatoes, Turner Classic Movies, MeTV, PBS, and NPR to the publisher or agency field in the citation template so that it is not italicized. Otherwise, I support this list for featured list promotion.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. ~ HAL  333  21:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments from TRM

 * "A prolific actor, Jackson's films have collectively grossed" this is a little repetitive and confusing: (a) you don't need to repeat his name (b) we already know he's an actor (c) you said previously he was also a producer but this "Jackson's films" is that just as an actor (per the sentence) or including his work as a producer?
 * "with a small part" minor role?
 * To avoid repetition, I prefer "small part". ~ HAL  333  21:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "His other early film appearances were minor roles in films such as " -> "He also made brief appearances in films such as...
 * "and, in 1994, he starred" the following year (to mix up the in XXXX repeat)
 * "received a Golden Globe nomination" another
 * "Two years later, he starred in the science fiction horror film Deep Blue Sea.[11]" is this noted for any particular reason?
 * It supports that the genre is "science fiction horror". ~ HAL  333  21:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "Also in 2000, he " -> The same year
 * Television roles don't appear to be covered at all in the lead?
 * Although I cover The Sunset Limited, Jackson's television performanes are all very bried and not much of note. Secret Invasion may change that as he may be the main character. ~ HAL  333  21:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "One episode" v "1 episode" be consistent.
 * "Denotes television series that have not yet been released" there are none.
 * Corrected. ~ HAL  333  21:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "The Public Theatre" Theater apparently.
 * "The Mountaintop" doesn't need piping.
 * Year -> Year(s).
 * Year range MOS now says we should include full years on either side of the en-dash.
 * Although that's what Mr. Jackson would call a "stupid-ass decision", I guess I'll roll with it. Done. ~ HAL  333  22:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

That'll do for a first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * What does "Also likeness" mean?
 * Removed. ~ HAL  333  21:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "Samuel Jackson Announcer" he just announces himself? What does that mean?
 * Clarified (hopefully) in note column. ~ HAL  333  21:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * NYT sources require a subscription.
 * Ref 5, isn't Variety a work?
 * Refs 179, 182, etc date format inconsistent. Check all.
 * Ref 157 SHOUTING.
 * Ref 205, Evening Standard is linked (no others appear to be linked) and not in italics.
 * are you going to address the remaining issues? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes - I apologize. Been extremely busy lately. Will try to knock these out tonight! ~ HAL  333  20:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * All done now - sorry for the tardiness. ~ HAL  333  21:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Source review – Pass
Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Version reviewed 1
 * Formatting
 * Ref#22 "1 November 1999" - inconsistent with the date style.
 * Ref#198 "1 November 1999" - inconsistent with the date style.
 * Various references have "The Los Angeles Times", but the newspaper and the Wikipedia article calls it just "Los Angeles Times", without 'The' ... Better to follow that way.
 * Ref#152 "Hollywood Reporter" should be written as "The Hollywood Reporter" to be consistent with rest of the article.
 * Rest fine. I had included some formatting issued in my previous comments here, which were addressed.
 * Reliability
 * No issues
 * Verifiability
 * Did a few spot-checks, everything looks good.
 * All done. Sorry for the delay - been very busy irl. ~ HAL  333  15:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No issues. Pass for source review. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.