Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Soul Eater chapters


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 18:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC).

---

List of Soul Eater chapters
My entry for the FLC contest. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 07:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose—Cr. 6. While Japanese script has its own beauty, here, it's denigrated by being turned into an agent of extreme clutter. Instead, it's ugly. Please remove it all—this is for English speakers; there's a Japanese WP too. Tony   (talk)  11:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I absolutely disagree. The original media was in Japanese, and we should display it. Take the issue up with WP:ANIME, and I'll remove it only with consensus from there (and this would entail removing the kanji from all other episode and chapter lists). — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 19:20, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Also disagree with this oppose. We do not ignore the original language just because this is the English Wikipedia. All anime and manga articles include the original Japanese for titles, episodes, characters, and chapters. As Sephiroth noted, if feel this should be removed from every last, it should be taken up with both the anime and manga project and the Japanese project. As it is, this is in keeping with all relevant guidelines. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * http://www.square-enix.co.jp/magazine/market/souleater/ deadlinks
 * Otherwise sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Not that I did not evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:29, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed the deadlink. Thanks for checking. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 19:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Prose looks good in the lead. Gary King ( talk ) 18:20, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments, since only one volume has been released in English yet, I'm guessing the other English titles are all unofficial translations? This should probably be noted somewhere. Volume 13's summary seems a little short compared to the rest? Why isn't the anime adaptation mentioned in the lead? -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * English titles in Yen Press are still the same I believe, so I don't think it's necessary. The volume 13 summary is short because that's basically all that happens. Think of your typical shōnen manga series. And added a mention of the anime to the lead. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 19:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Alrighty, looks good and understandable on #13. Only other question would be should the "Chapters not yet in tankōbon format" be sourced (presumably to the Yen Press issues they were published in? -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not necessary per precedent with past lists and their respective nominations. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 19:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Good to know. :) Minor note, but that section uses the term tankōbon, but the lead pipes it with "bound volumes" which isn't consistent. Otherwise, all looks good. Sources are fine, prose reads well, don't see any unsourced stuff. So Support. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed last comment. Thanks, — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 19:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Support, I have never heard of Soul Eater, but it was easy to understand. Sources are okay.Tintor2 (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Support, Having been working with this article for a while now, I'm pleased to see it reach such high quality, especially with the chapter summaries.--  十  八  00:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Support, Seems like a solid piece of work. Doceirias (talk) 03:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.