Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Soundgarden band members/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 08:27, 26 September 2008.

List of Soundgarden band members
Created the page yesterday and got much help from. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Support - most of my concerns have been addressed, good work.  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  12:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment a 'list' with seven items is not considered to be long enough to be featured quality. I suggest you merge this information into the Soundgarden article. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * This is a personnal meaning which has nothing to do with a FLC nomination. And the list is big and has much information. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 17:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I haven't opposed it, I'm just trying to make everyone aware of the consensus that a list of less than ten is not featured quality. Consider merging it with the Soundgarden article.  The Rambling Man (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I do realise that you're one of the FL directors but I don't see anywhere on WP:FLC or WP:FL? it saying featured lists need to contain more than 10 things, so in fairness how is anybody to know? How about List of Dream Theater band members?  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  18:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See this. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose - per comments by The Rambling Man and the fact that the article fails CR 4, structure. It's not long enough to be a list, maybe if if the band had like 15 members, then it would be good. S R X  23:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Current ref 5 (Erlewine... ) lacks a last access date.
 * Addressed.-5- (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Otherwise sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose simply not Wikipedia's finest work. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.