Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of South African Twenty20 International cricketers

List of South African Twenty20 International cricketers
A complete list with no redlinks, support, jguk 20:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: The picture completely obstructs the upper right corner of the table when accessing the page in Firefox. Should be changed promptly. Additionally, it's "as of", not "as at". &mdash; Nightstallion (?) 21:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I've added a , but I don't know if that's enough to fix it or not. If not, are you or another Firefox user seeing this able to fix the problem? I'm on IE myself, and it's difficult to fix a problem you can't see. On the grammar point, I disagree - "as at" implies "at a particular snapshot in time", "as of" implies "from a particular time onwards", and I think it's best here to imply "at a particular snapshot in time" as it is on 9 January 2006 that the most recent game was played, jguk 07:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * clear is to  what Superman is to Clark Kent. Fixed. ;) That said, I don't see any reason not to support this, although I'm not really interested in the topic at all... I'll support as soon as you change the reference style to fit WP:CITE guidelines for websites. &mdash; Nightstallion  (?) 08:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose as per my similar rationale on List of American ODI cricketers and also because the external link to cricinfo, cited as a reference, appears not to work. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The link has been corrected. As far as I'm aware this list in this format can only be found on Wikipedia - providing information not easily available elsewhere is certainly within the remit of what Wikipedia does best. Also, this list has 18 entries - is there a minimum number of entries required for a list for it to have a chance to become a featured list? jguk 18:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Still oppose, I'm afraid. The info at cricinfo is in a very similar format (it just splits out batting and bowling). There's no minimum number of entries, of course, but common sense says to me that a list which contains lots of statistics on batting and bowling averages becomes much less useful when it's averaged across only two matches! --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 09:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)