Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of TNA Television Champions/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:14, 21 August 2011.

List of TNA Television Champions

 * Nominator(s): -- Will C  14:44, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

I've been trying to make two topics about TNA Championships. One about the reigns and one about the titles. All current title lists are done except this one. Then there are a few more from TNA's past but they need alot of work. So here is this one. The topics are located here (reigns) and here (championships); this may explain better.-- Will C  14:44, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Strong oppose no need at all to split from the main (tiny) article of TNA Television Championship. Suggest nominator withdraws as this is a clearcut abuse of 3b. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It follows the same pattern as the rest of the articles. Also, the TV Title article needs to be rewritten as there is more that can be included into it. It can easily be made to be at the same size as TNA World Tag Team Championship or TNA Women's Knockout Championship. As well as it was agreed at WT:PW that once the history exceeds 10 reigns, it is to be broken off into a list. Isn't anything different from this and the others I've done honestly. Just recently the belt designs section was removed in the TV article because the title belt design today was conflicted.-- Will C  07:03, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid it's not about what other articles have done in the past, it's about whether this is capable of being a standalone list, given the paucity of the main article. My opinion is that it cannot.  The Rambling Man (talk) 18:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Problem with that is it is pick and choose, considering the other articles have the same format as this one, and this one was based off those. I did that for consistency purposes. If those pass, this one should pass. Large enough the article passed a GA review. If it is large enough to pass a GA review, I would assume the main article is fine, while this one meets the agreement at WT:PW and is fully sourced. It is also the same size at the most recent passed List of TNA World Heavyweight Champions. No difference in this one than those.-- Will C  22:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it's not pick and choose, it's whether the list should be separated from the main article or not. The main article is small and there's no good reason to split the list out to a separate article.  I have little or no interest in what WT:PW say, this is FLC.  Having said all that, of course this is just my opinion, and I'm sticking with it until I see a better reason than "others are 'like' this and have passed".  The Rambling Man (talk) 07:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Good reason: Article needs re-expansion. Main article passed GAN with table, so some information was left out. Article passed GAN in 2009, has not been expanded since.-- Will C  23:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * So I'll withdraw the oppose when the main article is re-expanded sufficiently to enable this list to be standalone. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I shall begin re-expansion as soon as I can.-- Will C  19:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. Let me know when you're done, good luck!  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.