Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of TNA World Heavyweight Champions/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 12:33, 16 July 2011.

List of TNA World Heavyweight Champions

 * Nominator(s): -- Will C  13:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because... I nominated this once before but it didn't gain enough support to pass. Copyedited it real quick and decided to renominate it.-- Will C  13:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments - Not a lot in the way of issues but a few inconsistencies I think should be cleared up, for example how Slam Sports is stylized. "Afterwards, TNA ceased to recognize Angle's first title reign nor the vacancy for unknown reasons." I would think this statement needs some sort of source. Afro  ( Talk ) 17:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree with Afkatk, this needs a source. And if this reign isn't recognized by TNA, than why does it have a number. If you see for example the title history of the WWE Championship, then this reigns don't have numbers in the first column. Armbrust  Talk to me  Contribs  23:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Well the problem with List of WWE Champions was it was passed four years ago and goes by the in universe history rather than the factual history, which means it violates In-U. The reason the reign has a number is it can factually be proven it occurred and was recognized. It use to have a source to TNA's official history, but they remove the history to the title all the time. As such I cann't show they don't recognize it on their site anymore, or any other reign at that.-- Will C  00:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Also fixed the slam problem afro.-- Will C  10:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I would suggest hiding the information or removing it until a source can be found. Afro  ( Talk ) 16:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Might as well. Everything else is sourced and the article is factual. Only problem I've not been able to solved. Removed.-- Will C  00:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - I'll support the promotion, like I said before there's no real issues with the list. Afro  ( Talk ) 16:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Sir Armbrust  Talk to me  Contribs  15:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Support Nice read and I can't see any outstanding issues. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 05:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

 Comments Support – Overall this looks quite clean. Just a couple minor things I spotted toward the end...
 * Footnote A: "wrestlers with the same number mean that they are tied for that certain rank." Can't put a finger on it, but something is bugging me about this. Removing "mean that they" leaves "wrestlers with the same number are tied for that certain rank." To me that sounds better.
 * The titles of references 8 (twice), 36, and 37 have hyphens that should be en dashes. This is admittedly very picky, but I've seen others mention this from time to time in various FLCs, including this one.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 22:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Done both-- Will C  04:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.